Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/943/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/943/2006 Généré par l'IA

Prior Testimony Admissibility Under Confrontation Clause

Numéro de cause ATAS/943/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns the admissibility of testimony under the confrontation clause when the witness is unavailable, focusing on prior inconsistent statements made in earlier proceedings. The court reasoned that the declarant's prior testimony, given under oath and subject to cross-examination in a proceeding with similar motivation to an earlier preliminary hearing, possessed sufficient indicia of reliability to be admitted, notwithstanding the witness's subsequent unavailability, because the opportunity to cross-examine at the prior hearing provided the necessary procedural safeguard against unreliable hearsay.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Prior Testimony Admissibility Under Confrontation Clause: The court reasoned that the declarant's prior testimony, given under oath and subject to cross-examination in a proceeding with similar motivation to an earlier preliminary hearing, possessed sufficient indicia of reliability to be admitted, notwithstanding the witness's subsequent unavailability, because the opportunity to cross-examine at the prior hearing provided the necessary procedural safeguard against unreliable hearsay.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
témoignage confrontation audition ou interrogatoire procédure préparatoire déclarations contradictoires exigences de preuve

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court orders the losing party to pay the procedural costs.
Généré par l'IA
A/4263/2005
Evidence Admissibility in Subsequent Proceeding Despite Prior Exclusion
P/2583/2014
Testimony by Protected Witness Versus Right to Confrontation
A/1515/2007
Appeal on Admissibility of Prior Inconsistent Statements in Liability Dispute
A/4340/2007
Prior Consistent Statements Admissibility Upon Claimed Memory Loss
P/5843/2024
Witness Statement Admissibility Following Extradition and Procedural Rights Violation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court orders the losing party to pay the procedural costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               $%&%'$&''( $)*+$&''(



, -,   ,   

./0  % " +% 1 0  &''(       !"#$%    "#"  "# !"#$% &        '   (  ( !)#%    "$6"

(                  !+",-.%   

( *   *  !"#'' "#/'"0/1!/'2334%5 & 

             !"#

  789 

 2

-< =1#'">6$?7::;!-;@#)#0" 0"/#@' AB/@ C/$"?""# !$ ! ->2>!' !$->9:!#$"'"-7#->47<

7< *)66>"=1#'/$'$! "$'D/'"+, $''","?/'1/#'$"?"/$?E/6 +/)"$/D"'#1<

3<  /$ " "? ' "? "$6'6  73 # 7::; '  =1#' " 0"/#@'$'$'#2?7::; 0"$ /+B/@""#''%'6$<

2<  0"$'$"/'#"'''"/$?E! /'/$'''"$6"/'"##+ #''"?+"'#1!''-7#->47' 73#7::;<

9< ,''#$/ 0"$/#",$'06'?'F

C ,1'"?""# F

• "#",$'$66$%'''"/$?E?'->>-! "'%+'$/@"G  &< B'6$$ "$#07::9##"39,>.96<.9%(  ( <

• *"(  ( "9/'#07::;!#/$'$ /'$$/"->'07::;!?+,$@?'%3.,;-26<29! '$H'E#/73#7::;<

0C ,1'"?" F

• "#"$'$66$/@"(   I             A(C " - '0 ->.9  3- '0 ->>7! " - 6$? ->>2  3: ? ->>9! / " - =?  3- ='->>;< '''''"/$?E?$/''"0 /1?'F;2,7:46<-:->>3!-,7>.6<.9->>4'.,.;;6<-: 7::-%           A C!/;,39;6<2: ->>;%( *   *  "5 &<

• *" 4#7::;!?+/"#" ,$@?'%-:7,>346<;9!'$H'E#/73#7::;<

    8-7-:87::; 389 

• *   "  (  *    *  ! "#''"#/'"0/1%5 &">'07::;! ?+,$@?'%-.,:2>6<.9'$H'E#/73#7::;<

• *   "  ( " 3 '0 7::;!  ? +  " #1!'$H'E#/73#7::;!'"7.,2.26<29<

;<  6#' 0' " ''' " /$?E ' $'$ '# D /'<="'"+$+,%"$6'",0?'",3:'0 7::;!H''"''0<

.< ,0",0='""$6D$!$'$1"$%=1<

 

-< ,'<79"6$"$0/1"/$?E/6! ?!??''?"'$"-."$#0->>3A(C!'$?1 -=?7:::!@1/$"""?<+='' /"J"/''"'%/'1A'<-77'-73 " ?B C! =1"""?#/$''",'<.3<-"6$"$ /$?E /6 " 79 = ->47 AC! ' % @?  0 '""/-K'7::3!"'!/@+,66  $'$'#A'<-27 C!D$'",66/'10" $" $/''"$'#$/=1""?.

7< *,'<77(A?'?1"/-=?7:::C! " "?!  /'' " ' + "'  #1 ' /'1$ 6#$#' D'<-77!-73!-2-'-27 L'<3%9 (,//+' /1#''%'6$A<-C<)+='!/''" '%/'1/"%"66$'/''"'!1#'$ " ? " 0 /1 D'' $?'#'  ##' " "?! '  /''"'!1#'$"?"0/1D''$?'#' ##'""#1A6<'<72(C<!='%  /'' " ' ' % ,? " 0 /1 D''  ##' "   " #1  '$H' "  ##' " "? A ( -74  73:L (-7>222C<

2< J/@!=1"/#@'"$/'1/#'$"? /$?E /6 + / ) " $/D "'  #1<  "'/'''!"J/'!"#1-7#->47!"J'/' 73#7::;!"'%+=1#'""?'"?D$'<

    8-7-:87::; 289 

3< *  "#' /"'!  /'' + /  "#" ' " -->,>446< 2: A' -:7,>34 6< ;9 M -.,:2> 6< .9C<  ?' ", "$"  ??'#1'7.,2.26<29!"'+#''%/'1/ "#" ' " >7,9-3 6< >9 A-->,>44 6< B 7.,2.2 6< 29C<  + /  "#" ' " 3.,;-2 6< 29<  '$H' ' "$=% $'$ $ /  '''"/$?E"$6"< "#""'%DB$/  #'' " 2.,.9. 6< A>7,9-3 6< >9 F7C! ' B  "' -4,4:. 6< 7: A3.,;-26< 29 F 7C! " ' + ,'  "#" + "' %  DB$/  #''"74,>2>6<4:<

2< 6#$#' %  =/"! "/  = "$'#' /  /'1 =+,##'"'6'"/''"'""#!=' "?$0$$6"''/''"'%"'$H'#/' #''"B< '$H''$'D###$1,'<-7 ","/$?E/6?!??''?"'$ " -4 ? ->42 A 7C    'D $1#'!  B ' /$ A (/0$3;8:7"-4='7::3C<

9<  $##'   /N!  /$" $'' 1'' A'< .3 < 7  ' 4>&<-"/$""#''?"-7/'#0->49C<

    8-7-:87::; 989 

  2  -,   ,   

"

31 4 // 5  6        7 # %(& 89



-< ?'(                     % '6$ " #/' "   !  ## " 74,>2> 6< 4: %  (  ( !  6? " "#  !  + " '$H' #/'   " "$'! "@  73 # 7::;!=+,##'"'6'<

7< JE"#''+"0<

3< '+/$"'1''<

2< 6#  /' "  +, /?' 6#  '  /$' H' "  "$ " 3: = "@  '6' / / ##"$ "$  0 6$"$ " ! *)OP)6+ ;! ;::2   !  ' D#/<  "$  /' H' /1$<  #$# "' F C "+ D'#' + "$  ' "$ 0'   ' / "  "$''+$L0CD//+#'6'#/?"#"'' '"$LC/'1'"/$''<*#$#  '' /  ' $$#' $#$$  '' C 0C ' C B"!  06$"$"//'#'@+, "?"$?0<#$#"#'#E " /?! + ' ='!  +  "$ ''+$ ' ,?// " +$'$D/$"$'A'<-37!-:;'-:4C<  166@  $"'F     B  5 G    

/6#"/$'H'''6$D/'+J%J666$"$ "/166

    8-7-:87::;