Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/942/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/942/2007 Généré par l'IA

Promissory Note Liability Affirmation

Numéro de cause ATAS/942/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant challenged a liability determination stemming from a complex financial transaction involving multiple parties and several related promissory notes secured by real property, arguing that the trial court misinterpreted governing documents and evidence regarding repayment obligations and alleged breaches. The court affirmed the lower court's findings, reasoning that the documentary evidence and testimony supported the conclusion that the appellant was liable under the terms of the instruments, which unambiguously established their obligations and the corresponding right of the opposing party to remedy upon default, thus rejecting the appellant's construction of the contractual language and evidence.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Promissory Note Liability Affirmation: The court affirmed the lower court's findings, reasoning that the documentary evidence and testimony supported the conclusion that the appellant was liable under the terms of the instruments, which unambiguously established their obligations and the corresponding right of the opposing party to remedy upon default, thus rejecting the appellant's construction of the contractual language and evidence.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
billet à ordre responsabilité contractuelle défaut d'une partie instruments financiers fortune immobilière obligation réelle

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This article is cited in the dispositive orders to regulate the costs of the proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
C/9481/2020
Appellants v. Respondent: Joint and Several Liability on Promissory Note
A/3837/2007
Promissory Note Validity and Guarantee Enforceability
A/1173/2011
LLC v. Creditor Regarding Promissory Note Enforcement
A/3486/2006
Promissory Note Default and Security Enforcement
A/2507/2003
Loan Default and Promissory Note Enforcement

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article is cited in the dispositive orders to regulate the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

           #$%&'#$((' )#*+$#$(('

)

 ) )     

,-. +  & /-. $((' 



 !"#$% !   & %

 ! !"  '  

(

% % %%) %%   ".  %%   

) %% ) %%+  '%  %(),- 

          !   "

  /#1  

 0)

*$ 34!( /,5/22-16!7!8  8 9!6( 9"  5   !  " :  *;-1 ( "*;1<!" ( *."5/222$

/$ %  7.. 0  34!( 9"("  8  9!6 (  " ( = !      5  9(4 9 !("  5  9"5>9.?97 @= (!4$

0$ 34!(  5( 5 ".(.-3/22-("("(! @..  8 "*A3/22-9="( 9(4$

<$  8 "(" 9(! ((( 9"5> 9(9"((( ". 9( !!? !((  5   9( ? (  !4 ( (  *."5/222(-3/22-$

1$  5(4( !" 9  8  " ( 9! @"(8  .( 5(B

$ %@4( 5 9"5>  ! B

 (  / 3( /22-   %  %% .!(  8  "?@5?3 !4@"5(C0<@;2-.$*2D4!("  ("E(3?@3  5@5!(C<,@1A-.$02$9((  (((!"3  5@"65C<,@-;2.$02$ ?( (5F9(( 894 @!(( /20.$ (  *, 9(!8 /221 95(   '     %     %  $ (54!(" ("E(3?@3  5@"65C/.$;1$

'    %    %  4"4 % !  ?99 0*3(/22-5(.""9(( 8 94  /@/1- .$ 96   %  %% 9 ( C  9"  ((( *9(!8*;;A0*G(*;;;$ ? "4!( 5 (.""  !((  /20 .$ =  %  %% 9 (C..( "8(( *35/2210*!/221$



8$ %@4( 5 9"5>  ! B

 %% ) %%+ '%% )  )  ?  (  *0 3( /22- ?  9((  (   ! C ( !4>!9("E(3?@3  5

    #/01-#/22- 0#1  

@"65C*@<,1.$*1$%9(( (023/22-!(?(CC 0<@21A.$ A1$     ( 9"" ? ( !9   !((  ((   @4!(C99"(" 4!( @!((  *,@A22.$  (  *A 5 /22,  ?@ 9((  8 94  *@*,;.$;2F//3/22*  %% % &   $

 !   8 " 9"" ( /23(/22- ?9(( (0*!/22-!(C00@<12.$;2$

9 -G(/22-'   + &   ??   !  .."  *  ! /222  0* (8 /222  !"  9(( 894 *@*0A.$;1?"("(.""4!("  ("E( 02.$;1/23/22*C $

,$  !(("("(!=9( ( *,G(/22-$3 (  ?"?@5 96!!?"9(( 894C 9(4 @"65( C / .$ ;1 9  !  ( C <A@-A1.$-1 9  !  ( ?@C ".( @85( @  /A G( /22-  E( (  ((8$

-$ @8 @83(  ".=""("4 "C34$

 )

*$ @($/1 ." "894 9"5>9. 555((5 (" *- "!8*;;0H'I("54 *35/222649"   5$?3(( 9 J 9(( (C9(4H($*//(*/0   5) I 34   5!9"(( @($-0$* ." " 9"5> 9.  /1 3 *;A/ HI ( C 65  8 (  9*G(/220 (96?@..  "("(!H($*</ I="( @..9(48  "  "9(( "(!"934  5$

/$ %@($//'H5(54 9*35/222I  5  9((  ( ? (  !4 ( 9(4" .!"!( =($*//*/0*<*(*</ D($0C1 '@99?( 94!((C(."H$*I$7?3(9((  (C9(49 C .."(9(( (4!("  5  8 94 =(( "5(!(  !!(  5 (  9(( (4!(" 5 894=(("5(!( !!(  !4H.$($/<'I$3(

    #/01-#/22- <#1  

C  9((  ( ( C @5  8 94 =((  !!(     !4  ("E(   !!(  5 H ' */A  /02D '*/;<<<I$

 J96  34  9!6 (   "  9(4 9 !("  9((  ( ? (  !4 9  ! $  ( 9(( ( J 9(   !4  * ."5 /222 J( 9(  -3/22- (C?34!(  5( 5="($

0$ %  !( 9 (  9(( ? 9 (  !4 9  !   (  / .$ ;1$ (!(    8  "  *,G( /22-  9((  (   !  @"65 C 0*@;A1 .$ -1 H00@<12 .$ ;2 ) *@<,1 .$ *1ID  ..(  !(( !!?" 9   !9( "3C  ((  *,@A22 .$ C (( @4!( C  99"("  4!($  !  (C=)"9!(( *2,.$H/.$ ;1B/I() (C)C!(( *1@;;/.$;2H0*@;A1.$-1B/I  (?J( ! ? ( ! !(( *1@AA,.$;2$

<$ .!"!( C  39  9  3 "(!( 9  9(4 3?@!!( (.( 9(( (  !3( 5"8"". ((9(( (C ("E(!9( !(( )$ ("E(("(=!!!"4@($*/ @ 9"5>9.555((5 ("  *A 5 *;A< H /I    (= "4!(  ) ( 9" H '*/;/11 $0I$

1$  "!!(   9F  9"  "(( 4(( H($ -0 $ /  ( A;&$* 9"  !((5 */9(!8*;A1I$



KKK



    #/01-#/22- 1#1  

  1)0  ) )     

*$ 5(  %%  ) %%  +  '%%  C (."  !9(   !   !!  *1@AA, .$ ;2 =  %  %%  .5   ? ("E(!9(  "( 6 3?@!!( (.($

/$ J> !((? 8$

0$ (?9" (4(($

<$ .!  9(   ?J 95( .!  (  9"( E(   "  02 3 6  (.( 96  8 ." " H%7LM7.?,,22<  I95 !(6  ( 98.!"!(=($A/ ." " 8." " *- 3 /221 H 'ID  !"!   (  ?   !(. ( !> 95(9(4( ( ! (D ( E(  "  8 ." " 9 5 9(  9 5 "(? =  (  @($ </  '$  9"( E( (  96  9  (5?"!!!> 95 5(E(3(C@5$  4..6  " (B         %>5 & N   

9.! 9"(E(((."=9(?JCJ..." " 94..

    #/01-#/22-