Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/939/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/939/2006 Généré par l'IA

Arbitration Award Interpretation Within Scope of Authority

Numéro de cause ATAS/939/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party challenged an arbitration award, arguing that the arbitrators exceeded their powers by modifying the scope of a contract settlement agreement, specifically by interpreting a release clause to exclude certain claims the party believed were unambiguously covered. The court reasoned that the arbitration agreement clearly granted the arbitrators the authority to interpret the settlement agreement, and when an arbitrator arguably misinterprets a contract within the scope of their delegated authority, the remedy is generally not to vacate the award, as courts are hesitant to overturn arbitration awards absent clear evidence of exceeding powers or evident partiality, and the alleged error involved interpretation, not an act outside the scope of submission.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Arbitration Award Interpretation Within Scope of Authority: The court reasoned that the arbitration agreement clearly granted the arbitrators the authority to interpret the settlement agreement, and when an arbitrator arguably misinterprets a contract within the scope of their delegated authority, the remedy is generally not to vacate the award, as courts are hesitant to overturn arbitration awards absent clear evidence of exceeding powers or evident partiality, and the alleged error involved interpretation, not an act outside the scope of submission.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
arbitrage interprétation du contrat valeur litigieuse arbitrabilité notion de pouvoir adjudicateur nullité des ententes

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court orders the appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



                !"#$ %##&  '!' %##&

((

 ( ) ))  ()  

*+  %  !$ ,-,  %##& 



 !"#$!%&'(    )  





)

         *    * ! )#$ )" +,(-!.)!%&%%   /



            

   2&012  

) ) . 

  "$ "   " &3 4) &''/ $#) 5     )))"6##"&6'''78.")9)7#:$5 ))"4:54&''/;)).$."$)$)<=>

"?)<&''/>

6..))"$..)"%&.)#<&''/#)))##5 @''78>

"$A$)$79$5&()<&''/.$.")"$. ">

."%?)<&''/!.A7#$ <A6"  .: "6 :#) " %6/-3 78 #.B)  !  #.)  ## $#$! " ) A   ":)  <4)! ) #)))  )! .!5:<$$7")7#!"C%4)&''/>

6"$"$))9$5.8

) () ) ( 

D9 )# " D)8 (1 "   7$"$   .) B$$ " ") "   ; =! ..< 5 )) " ") ..$)7 ;)8 -(  E= D.)"$"$"$..)4AD5D: ".$: <>

))D.C>

D:":"$!":)<4))AD:)"F "G8 ///



01('%0&''/  21012  

(  0 .  ( ) ))  ()  



1-,2,++ 3   4, ,  ,  56 $&% 7

%8 ")""$".D)#$%@)<&''/8

&8 ))A)":<4)8

18 F"G8

-8 7#  .) "  AD .:) 7#  )  .$) ,) "  "$ " 1' 4 "C  )7) . . ##"$ "$  < 7$"$ " ! *+HI+7A /! /''-   !  ) 9#.8  "$  .) ,) .B$8  #$# ")J = "A 9)#)A"$)"$<)).""$ ))A$> <= 9. . A #)7  )# .: "#" )) ) "$> = .)  B)   "  .$))8 *  #$#  )) .  ) $$#) $#$$  )) = <= ) = 2"!  <7$"$"..)#)CAD ":"$:<8#$#"#)#F " .:! A ) 4)!  A  "$ ))A$ ) D:.. " A$)$9.$"$);)8%1&!%'/)%'@=8

  B77J  .$")J          * <* 

.7#".$),)))7$9.).B77



 



01('%0&''/