Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/938/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/938/2005 Généré par l'IA

Age Discrimination Claim Dismissed on Business Justification

Numéro de cause ATAS/938/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party sued for wrongful termination, claiming the employer terminated employment because the employee was a protected age-group worker, which was in violation of a statute prohibiting such discrimination. The court reasoned that the evidence demonstrated the termination was based on a legitimate, non-discriminatory business reason, specifically the employee's failure to comply with established company policies regarding job performance and attendance, thus affirming the decision in favor of the former employer.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Age Discrimination Claim Dismissed on Business Justification: The court reasoned that the evidence demonstrated the termination was based on a legitimate, non-discriminatory business reason, specifically the employee's failure to comply with established company policies regarding job performance and attendance, thus affirming the decision in favor of the former employer.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
cessation d'emploi discrimination fondée sur l'âge politique de l'entreprise décision motivée travailleurs âgés harcèlement sexuel au travail

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied to allocate the costs of the federal proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
C/24493/2000
Employee Dismissal Upheld Despite Discrimination Allegations
C/4863/2015
Employee Wrongful Termination and Discrimination Appeal Upheld
C/4803/2001
Employee Overtime Wages and Wrongful Dismissal Discrimination Claim
C/28445/2011
Employee Abandonment Justified Termination Despite Discrimination Claim
C/30186/2005
Employee Retirement Termination Upheld Against Unpaid Salary and Discrimination Claims

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied to allocate the costs of the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               #$%&'#$(() #%&*#$(()

""

+ ",+   -   +"  -,

. / 0  $' 1/ $(() 



  ! "

!" 

   ##  #$% ! &$'()*  + %"%,

            !" 

   0)-)0  

 ! 1! ,%2"%%" 2",1  $"'( !3")&4

  !5 6"%!     ##  #$ ",  ( 1"5  )& %7! "  %5  , 89    ,%%!   !11!%"%! ! 89  1!%!"!,,"4

9%!1 "%!1 !1 "%'(!"!5 )&$!  8  ! "  !7% , 6!%  :$  '; !"!5  )<$  ,%%!   !11!%"%!   ##  #4

9%=%$!,8$!"" 8 ! 1! ,%2"%%" 2", 1 9 ,6%"!52"4

"  -,2  ",+   -   +"  -,

 13   4  5   67 8'$ -

'> ,   !52"  !  1!  ,%  2"% 7! , 1   4

)> %"81 !, "? "%"4

.> = @>



? 77% A  ,%"A  B%    %  

!1%!7! 1 ," C""!"%7%,D1 "%%%8EFE77%7,,  ",15%81 ? 77



-)(./-)&