Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/933/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/933/2004 Généré par l'IA

Assignment Validity Challenged by Prior Restrictions

Numéro de cause ATAS/933/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A legal challenge was brought regarding a document that, on its face, appeared to be a valid assignment of an interest in a partnership, but the dispute centered on whether the purported assignor had the authority to execute the document given certain prior restrictions. The court reasoned that while the document itself contained strong indicia of validity, the existence of prior, unrescinded agreements or conditions limiting the assignor's power to transfer the interest was a crucial factual issue requiring further development or proof to overcome the presumption of validity arising from the instrument itself.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Assignment Validity Challenged by Prior Restrictions: The court reasoned that while the document itself contained strong indicia of validity, the existence of prior, unrescinded agreements or conditions limiting the assignor's power to transfer the interest was a crucial factual issue requiring further development or proof to overcome the presumption of validity arising from the instrument itself.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
documents valables validité de cession de créance présomption assignant interdiction de la cession contestation de l'établissement des faits

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/2590/2005
Validity of Assignment Without Contractual Consent
A/606/2006
Validity of Assignments Litigation
A/1979/2005
Contractual Assignment Restriction Dispute
A/1983/2008
Debt Assignment Validity Challenge Admissibility Ruling
A/2376/2004
Validity of Assignments by Foreign Entity Lacking Internal Documentation Filing

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               "##$%"%&" '"())"#%%&

' **'

+ '+* *',*  +* ,

#-  ./     $0 1  #%%& 



2,*',* *   34 ! 56666666666  #  ! "#$$#%""& $ ' (    !# 



# 

,22 *',*  3+*7*8'$  "% )#*+,-!



                 !

   '/.3'  

$%$#  "45$6#% "##""$" $"$76 $8  9 & '" $"!6  $# # :

6$7 :

##" "#$$"!6 $# # "";$8  9 & :

$""###" "#$7 <  7##" "#:

  # ""  # %# .0+/=./113'/'  > .0+/*./113'/'  > .0+31./113'/' ' .0+30./113'/' > ./3?1./113'/' > ./222./113'3' :

7$"$#% "#$%$ "$31%/112:

$ ; # $   $" "    #!     " ; #   66"6"" #@ .0+/=.13"# " $$7#$   "<;7,$""#$6"" "!$ :

A $"#$ "B$:

$; # %A%#%C$6"  ;7"< "6"$ " ";  # "# #  C    #; '"  $6"" "!   C #":

 7 D 02 $  #"   #$ $%""  "! ;" !#"   "# $  <;7,$#" <5$ #$) ""$<$"" #$:

7" #!"  #;$$   <;7,$#" <5$ 766""# :



 .//01./112   '3.3'     ,'2  '+* *',*  +* ,



:.4   ;  <   3! $0# ,=

0D $#"#$#$" "#$7 D02 <;7,$#"  <5$@ .0+/=.13D

/D 6#%   " $  ;7 !  6#% # #     A  $  $" $ 01 <# $-  # "6" "#  " #%%$ $  "B 6$ $  94E"F4#6;" G G112     #" C%"D  $"    A  ##5D  %%#" $#" H I "$"; C % ;$""## $"#B "" $$""#  ;: BI C# # ; %# "6 "  "% #!#" $%$     $""#: I #   "5  #  $ #   D 9"  %%#"  # "   #" %  % #   I BI   I "'$  "B 6$ $   #     % "-   # ;7" $! $ "!BD  %%#" $ # % "# #  %#) $ !;"# <#" "";$""# ; 7!#$;  C$"# J D03/01G 01=ID    566"H  "$ H   "" BB#"                #"#6#%$ A  # "6"C """;7,766"6$ $#"566

 .//01./112