Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/931/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/931/2005 Généré par l'IA

Contract Damage Calculation and Mitigation Upheld

Numéro de cause ATAS/931/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The lower court was presented with a dispute concerning the proper calculation of a damage award following a finding of liability in a contract dispute, where the central issue was the interpretation of specific clauses regarding consequential damages and mitigation efforts. The reviewing court affirmed the lower court's ruling, reasoning that the contract language clearly excluded the type of damages sought by the appellant, and that the appellant failed to demonstrate sufficient evidence of having taken reasonable steps to mitigate its losses as required by established precedent, thereby upholding the damage calculation as factually and legally supported.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contract Damage Calculation and Mitigation Upheld: The reviewing court affirmed the lower court's ruling, reasoning that the contract language clearly excluded the type of damages sought by the appellant, and that the appellant failed to demonstrate sufficient evidence of having taken reasonable steps to mitigate its losses as required by established precedent, thereby upholding the damage calculation as factually and legally supported.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
calcul du dommage interprétation du contrat responsabilité pour dégâts d'eau règlement du litige arrêts en appréciation de validité obligation de chiffrer les conclusions

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied for the decision on court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               "#$%#"#&&' "()*"#&&'



 +, ++,  +   ,

-. '

! # /0. #&&' 



 ! "



"

#  #$ ##     !"% &'! "+, ("!)&))   &*



            !

   $&-1$  

%,%&*+&00'% $+%#  #2$(345( 6 $  7, 8((" 9+, (    "  ++%+" % (:! (" ; 0' )&'<)* !6   ,", "9, (  (+"%(++%=

%,(("%%10>&00'!>""""(("=

%))?"&00'%8,"""%,!"+("+" @"6%("!"%%,(=

%)1"A&00'!(68"+,9+ A%, 68"%,%&*+&00'!6(""",=

""%8"+,%+B+>@899%("!(6" (";0')&'<)*=

8"C'1C1%9,%,("D,,%%"% %*"A&0002 5!68("!>68@87%(,7 @ 8"", % ! %,  %,  ((" " 6  ,",9+,=

""% 6 8"+,  9"  8 "3+" %" E  % "!  "  %, " % &* + &00' " % +("+"  %,  ((" % 10 > &00'!  68 ""  (" "+, @ 8"%"=

"%3%7A>"!%"68:%:% F=

  "  +(" (  %" E6  (" 6 D" %  ((("(,"%@%%,((8"7",(68%,(:,! 6("%"+(%D2 G))0.&5!%"68("7%" @%%,(=



-&./&-&00'  $1-1$  



  1 , +, ++,  +   ,

!

23/4/.. 5  6// /  78 *9# , :

)C % " % 8" ( 8"+, %  %, % &* + &00 " %  %,(("%10>&00'!6%""%(";0' )&'<)*C

&C ,% A>"C

1C :%FC

/C "6(,%"D""C

'C 9+  (" %  68 (7" 9+  "  (," B" %  %, % 10 > %3  "9" ( ( ++%, %,  A 9,%, % ! #HIJH96 *! *00/   !  " E+(C  %,  (" B" (D,C  +,+ %"4 5 %6 E"+"6%,"%,A""(%%, ""6,= A5 E( ( 6 +"9  "+ (7 %+% "" " %,= 5 ("  D"   %  (,""C #  +,+  "" (  " ,,+" ,+,,  "" 5 A5 " 5 $%!  A9,%,%(("+"368 %7%,7AC+,+%+"+: % (7! 6 " >"!  6  %, ""6, " 87(( % 6,",E(,%,"2"C)1&!)0*")0.5C  D993  ,%"4             KL M :      

(9+%(,"B"""9,E("68@8999,%, %",(A6(D99



-&./&-&00'