Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/930/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/930/2007 Généré par l'IA

Wrongful Termination and At-Will Employment Dispute

Numéro de cause ATAS/930/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant, a former employee, sued the former employer for wrongful termination after being dismissed following an internal investigation, claiming the termination was without cause and breached an implied contract regarding progressive discipline. The court determined that the employment relationship was terminable at will, as the employee failed to establish a contract that varied this presumption, and further found that even if a progressive discipline policy existed, its invocation was a discretionary management function not mandated for the specific conduct that led to termination, thus affirming the judgment in favor of the former employer.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Wrongful Termination and At-Will Employment Dispute: The court determined that the employment relationship was terminable at will, as the employee failed to establish a contract that varied this presumption, and further found that even if a progressive discipline policy existed, its invocation was a discretionary management function not mandated for the specific conduct that led to termination, thus affirming the judgment in favor of the former employer.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
cessation d'emploi contrat de gestion d'entreprise politique de l'emploi litiges du travail compétence spéciale en matière de contrats de travail droits et obligations de l'agent

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF

Used to declare the appeal inadmissible based on procedural grounds.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied for the determination of court costs for the federal procedure.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

           %&''(%&))' *%+,)%&))'

*

 * $" $*$"  $   "

-  &  . /  &))' 



 !"#$%&#"'() + * 



+

,,   , -   +!" +.+/#0+%%12$%$$ %



              !"#$$     

   (%32(  

 " %&'!.%##5+ "00+ $16%##4+  + +78 !+"69!+:;;880 ! ,<

"0+09 <

=  6 ;0++ "";+>

?>@+A+;6!!"$11%79'B6'' "67 + ;8 $111  ' C+"  ! 7 "' ; + '  ! :!?,++:!"0+!:++"+""!!0+7 8 ?+"0!0+ !"79'0 +!+ :? 8+%##$;680!!009 D79'? +A+;8+.%##E68"! "0+0*78 ? 8"++0 +  8F+ ++GH68C+""H!++?

8 +'" 7  D 6;8 %##5 B 68 " ! H" ' ::+ !!" + :++;6.+0"'+ +!.! ? ,+' 8 ++++ !!" 76+?

 %# 6+ %##5 +  ! !  8 !+" 69 6 !  + ::+'!+78 !!"++ !" 9++ +C! ++; +  !  ! !9?  '' +!+ +6 ' ! :! 7 "'!6C+'! !::79'0:+! CC 8!0!!68A0;"?8"+0F+70" "!"H!+  8'"+ " 6 !  8 " 7 8  !! 0" 7 +' 0+ ,I!0 +0I?8+'"! ' !0 7  J 7 9' + 68 !!" 7 +'  $ 0+!. %##5?  ++ + 68 "H" 7 ' ! ++ 0; ! !0I  'I+ 0 8'"+ 7  ; 6  !"  * + ; ++H"++0"?@

?  > @  '  "+  +  00K+ 6 8C ; (  +'   ++  :+ +  :+ !++ +  ;+  ' B  +'  +   +"F+ 0 ":  + 7 8 !+" 69?  ";+ 0; +  8 0 ++ ++ ;+6 8  8 "+H+ 0 8++  ++;+?8++8+++ +:+; +78 !+"  CL!H '+  F+  +  A!" 8"'+ 0   +78 !+"0CL!H:+:@?

= +'+0+;8'+ 8+"?



3%4453%##4  (232(     #* 0 " * $" $*$"  $   "

 122   /

324 5 16 7( 8 "9

$? +7 ,,   , -  ;  "00+ $16%##4+"+8++0?

%? =I !++; .?

2? +;0" +H++?

/? :!  0+   ;= 0'+ :!  +  0"+ F+   "  2# 6 9  +:+ 09  . :" " M,CNGC:;55##/  O0' !+9  + 0.:!"!+A+?&% :" " .:" " $4 6 %##E M *O<  !"!   +  ;   !+: + !I 0'+0+H+ + ! +< + F+  "  . :" " 0 ' 0+  0 ' "+; A  +  8+? /%  *?  0"+ F+ +  09  0  +';"!!!I 0' '+F+6+78'?    H::9> " +>       J) P .,

 0 :!  0"+ F+ + +:" A 0+  ;= ,"++ 8++78"!0H::



3%4453%##4