Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/924/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/924/2006 Généré par l'IA

Insolvency and Fraudulent Property Transfer Challenge

Numéro de cause ATAS/924/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant challenged a lower court's finding that a transfer of property, made when the transferor was insolvent, was fraudulent under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, as the recipient failed to provide reasonably equivalent value for the interest transferred. The court affirmed the decision, reasoning that the lower court correctly determined the transferor was insolvent at the time of the transaction, and the statutory presumption of insolvency was not rebutted by evidence showing the recipient provided fair consideration, thus sustaining the finding that the transfer was voidable as a constructive fraudulent transfer.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Insolvency and Fraudulent Property Transfer Challenge: The court affirmed the decision, reasoning that the lower court correctly determined the transferor was insolvent at the time of the transaction, and the statutory presumption of insolvency was not rebutted by evidence showing the recipient provided fair consideration, thus sustaining the finding that the transfer was voidable as a constructive fraudulent transfer.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
transmission de la propriété insolvabilité transmission de preuves acquisition frauduleuse valeur résiduelle escroquerie

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision was used to order the appellant to pay the court costs.
Généré par l'IA
A/3351/2007
Fraudulent Conveyance Challenge Involving Intent and Consideration
A/1441/2005
Fraudulent Conveyance Determination Regarding Property Transfers and Secured Debt
A/4207/2005
Debtor's Transfer Upheld Against Fraudulent Conveyance Claim
A/2864/2005
Fraudulent Conveyance of Assets Dispute
A/2315/2005
Government Lien Enforcement Versus Fraudulent Property Transfer

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was used to order the appellant to pay the court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               $%%&&$'(() $*'+$'(()

""

, ", -  ,"- -

-. / )

 %( 0/ '(() 



 !"#$!%&%'  (  ) *

*

++     , !-.$#*! *#$ ("(/0!.*'1'2!%&%%3/'

               !" #

   (&4'(  

"$..*",66*",#.7(.38, 9"%: ;* &110 6#*  . " <* = .$ > ,* " ?  @

   " ( " %A .*#B &110 .3 " B * " @

  "$  ..* " ,  " %0 *B &110 *  "$ *$"%:;*&110@

  $. " ,  " %5 *B &110 6#*  B " $ "  "$.$*$@

  1  ,*? :' ? ' "   6$"$   .* -$$ " "* " "0*B&1117 9!=<,>,/".$/>,**$ " ! , .* "$  "$  ..* * <  $*$6#$@

, ,.3! ,*#$  "$$  "$  ..*  ,*  %0 *B&110@

,/*",."*!""$B=**"C" D?



4''554&110  ('4'(   " - 2  ", -  ,"- -

 304   5  6   7# 8)' 9

%? $B=*@

&? C"D@

'? 6#  .* "  <E ./* 6#  *  .$* F* "  "$ " '1 = "3  *6* . . ##"$ "$  B 6$"$ " ! GHIJH6< 0! 011A   !  * K#.?  "$  .* F* .-$?  #$# "*8 9 "< K*#*<"$*"$B**.""$ <$@ B9 K. . < #*6  *# ./ "#"  * "$@ 9 .*  -*   "  .$**? G  #$#  ** .  * $$#* $#$$   9 B9 * 9 ("!  B6$"$"..*#*3<E "/"$/B?#$#"#*#C " ./! < * =*!  <  "$ <$ * E/.. " <$*$K.$"$*7*?%'&!%10*%1L9?  -663  $"*   CG $ 

 .6#" .$* F***6$K.**G$**"E **> E$#.-66



4''554&110