Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/924/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/924/2005 Généré par l'IA

Statutory Interpretation of Information Protection Liability

Numéro de cause ATAS/924/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The petitioner sought review of a ruling concerning the scope of liability under a statute related to the protection of certain information, arguing that the lower court erred in its interpretation of the necessary elements for establishing a violation concerning data collection practices. The court, after reviewing the statutory language and relevant precedent, determined that the trial court correctly applied the law, finding that the challenged actions satisfied the statutory threshold for actionable conduct because the specific nature of the data involved and the context of its collection demonstrated the requisite harm or risk intended to be prevented by the legislation, thereby affirming the judgment below.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Statutory Interpretation of Information Protection Liability: The court, after reviewing the statutory language and relevant precedent, determined that the trial court correctly applied the law, finding that the challenged actions satisfied the statutory threshold for actionable conduct because the specific nature of the data involved and the context of its collection demonstrated the requisite harm or risk intended to be prevented by the legislation, thereby affirming the judgment below.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
droit de la protection des données étendue de la protection action en responsabilité droit de l'information interprétation de l'arrêt obligations d'aviser

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF

The appeal is dismissed because it was not filed against a final decision (Art. 93 LTF not being applicable here, as implied by the decision to dismiss under Art. 108).

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               #$%&%#$''( )#%$*#$''(

 )

 ) + +)+   + 

,  $  - ./  $''( 



01 23333333333 . 4.    5   * )) 2+  !"#$%&$'()#

* 



66 +)+  0 +7+5) .*./0 +,-)#

                    !"

   &$14&  

0..5 67# .$223 8**// /0.  9 0*0 9  5:* ;;;;;;;;;; .* 9  .  <         =.&9 )  *>?

0..5 '@*$223 8**599.*.: /09   *?

  .* 8*09 5 0$3@*$223?

 095.*./06-* $223?

5A * /  &. 5  .: /  . #.  0  0.. * 0.0#5#A/.  9  5.* *.. ?

5 *B34B4 5/..* *.9* #. 0..8C5(5#. 9 0#.?

5. +   .  9   *  5*.   0..   * C   #.*8*?



DDDDD



1$,',1$223  &414&  

  )6  ) + +)+   + 



89.1.   :  4.. .  0" -;$ <

  1. 

6B 0    #B

 1.

$B  *5*.0.. 99.*. 9 5 '@* $223B

4B **C  *#8*B

7B .*C9 0 *! *.*B

3B : /  9 *.   C5 9#* : /    *   9 0*  E*   0.  42 8  )  *.:.*. 9  9. //0  0  . :00     <FG.H F:C. % %227     * . A/9. B  0.  9* E*  9 !0B  /0/.  .*I > ..C  A*/*C0..  *0. *. .*90.. C0? > A9  9  C /*.: . *./ 9#.  /   *  0..? > 9 *   .!*      9 0**B <.  /0/.   *.* 9  * . 00/* 0/0 0    > > * > .&  .:00  9 9*  /*.)    C5. # 0  . #B/0/.   /*.  /+  9 # C.  * 8.* .. C  0.. C0 * 5#99  C0*0A90.0  *= *B64$62%*62'>B  ! ::. I   0.*I       . . . 

9.: /9 0* E***.:.0A9 *...C5(5::.:00   .9 ! ::



1$,',1$223