Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/910/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/910/2005 Généré par l'IA

Validity of Transaction Under Expired Agreement Governed by Notice Requirements

Numéro de cause ATAS/910/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court reviewed a claim concerning the validity of a transaction initiated under a prior, expired agreement and the subsequent application of a different, later agreement to that transaction. The lower court had determined that the earlier agreement, which contained a specific notice requirement for modification, was the controlling document for the transaction in question, leading to the conclusion that the subsequent agreement was inapplicable because proper notice under the expired contract had not been given. The reviewing court affirmed this decision, reasoning that a transaction must be governed by the contractual terms in effect at the time it was initiated, and since the operative transaction occurred when only the prior agreement was valid, the subsequent agreement's provisions, regardless of their terms, could not retroactively apply without satisfaction of the notice requirements stipulated in the controlling, operative contract.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Validity of Transaction Under Expired Agreement Governed by Notice Requirements: The lower court had determined that the earlier agreement, which contained a specific notice requirement for modification, was the controlling document for the transaction in question, leading to the conclusion that the subsequent agreement was inapplicable because proper notice under the expired contract had not been given. The reviewing court affirmed this decision, reasoning that a transaction must be governed by the contractual terms in effect at the time it was initiated, and since the operative transaction occurred when only the prior agreement was valid, the subsequent agreement's provisions, regardless of their terms, could not retroactively apply without satisfaction of the notice requirements stipulated in the controlling, operative contract.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
validité du contrat notification des ententes affaire conclue pour un terme strict expiration du bail longa manu traditio hypothèque légale du vendeur d'immeuble

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court ordered the losing party to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/2398/2006
Contractual Notice Requirements and Termination Validity
A/1253/1999
Contractual Extension Validity Dispute
A/326/2005
Contract Termination Validity Based on Notice Requirements
A/2336/2006
Contract Renewal Validity Due to Improper Termination Notice
A/4277/2006
Contract Renewal Notice Requirement Overrides Course of Dealing

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the losing party to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

     

   

 !!" #$! !!"

% %&

' #()' &#%  '& %&(

&* +  ,  -+ !!"

  

  ! " #$% #$ &'%$ !$$ (  ) %* $"$% *+  ,!% *" !!

"%$

  &     -      !%! ,    &&    .- / ! 0 ! ! 12

3 45

&*   ##,   &"!$ 

     < 96= <

,  . /,    .!<#$4  " #>!/ % ??!!, #$4 *    &     -         &&    .- / .!<#$4  !/ @

 <!  ??%,  "%$A *) #"B$ #$4 *  " #>!  7 "%"C$ 9::8 #"$%% $  , 9::1 3 9::= @

)  !! "%%, + * " !!" * "$%> ! "C!!$ 5!% ,%, 5$,

3 &"!$  % &*   % )5!% # ,%, *,$, @

)  *4 "$ #$ *,!!" * 1= D5!$ 9::; $, , 3  " #>!  #! % *  "  * =:E7F1 ?$G 7: $#$,%%  " #, % * "%!%!" < < <  B " #$!  !%,$H% "$%"!$  "%$!C%!" - 5 !%,$H% "$%"!$  "%$!C%!" &% %  ?$! *)* !!%$%!" @

 #$ *,!!" $ "##"!%!" * 8 5$! 9::; "%!?!,  9I 5$!  !  "?!$ ,  *,!!" * 1= D5!$ 9::; @

  " #>! $#$,%, #$ &'%$ !$$ (  !%$D%, $"$  9; ! 9::; "%$ *!% *,!!" @

)!5!%, 3  *,%$ !$  ! "!*,$% +  ,, % * #$5 " #, %!$ $  %%% *)!*,#*% * *J #$" B% #$K * " !!" "%  $D% * $"$ @

&   + "?"$ , % 3 )$%G ;I *  "! $ )"$>!%!" D*!!!$ ./  $!C %" * $ "! % " #,%% #"$ %%$ *  #$,%  @

)3 %$ * E$%G 71 *  "! $  #$",*$ * !!%$%!5 * 19 #% C$ 1F2; . / E%"$!%, #% *E"??! " $ $+H% "$*"$ E##   * %!$ *"%  !%%!" D$!*!+ % #%!C *EH%$ ??%, #$ E! * #$",*$ @

 *   ! +!4$%  *$"!% % "C!>%!" * #$%! %  *,!!" $ *5!% "##"C @

) E#4  !%%!" D$!*!+ * &*   % * &"!$ *$!< 0$  #"$$!% H%$ ??%, #$ E! *  #$,% #$",*$ @

)!  D%!?! #$ ",+% *  ##$   @

6172869::;

< =6= <

 & %#(0  #()' &#%  '& %&(

, 11 

1G ##   &*   % &"!$ G

9G $ ! #$%!%  *,!  9F "5 C$ 9::; #"$  *,%$ !$G

 >$??!4$  $,!*% L

&$!<"!  ( "$! M   

 "#! "?"$  * #$,% $$H% % "%!?!, J #$%! !! +)3 )??! ?,*,$ * $ "! #$  >$?? 

6172869::;