Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/903/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/903/2006 Généré par l'IA

Contract Interpretation: Deposit Versus Liquidated Damages

Numéro de cause ATAS/903/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case involves a dispute over the validity of a contract provision stipulating a penalty for early termination, where the initial payment was designated as either a deposit or liquidated damages depending on the circumstances of termination. The court reasoned that while the initial payment was expressly termed a deposit, the contract language detailing its forfeiture upon a specific type of breach demonstrated the parties' intent to stipulate liquidated damages, and since the amount was a reasonable forecast of just compensation for the breach, the provision was enforceable as liquidated damages rather than an unenforceable penalty.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contract Interpretation: Deposit Versus Liquidated Damages: The court reasoned that while the initial payment was expressly termed a deposit, the contract language detailing its forfeiture upon a specific type of breach demonstrated the parties' intent to stipulate liquidated damages, and since the amount was a reasonable forecast of just compensation for the breach, the provision was enforceable as liquidated damages rather than an unenforceable penalty.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
contrat de dépôt interprétation du contrat versement de dommages-intérêts péremption responsabilité pour le prospectus d'émission résiliation de contrat

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision was cited in the final order concerning the allocation of court costs.
Généré par l'IA
A/2781/2006
Contract Dispute Over Liquidated Damages Enforceability
A/1924/2007
Contractual Interpretation of Liquidated Damages Calculation
A/1545/2004
Liquidated Damages vs. Actual Damages in Breach of Contract
A/1961/2007
Enforceability of Liquidated Damages Clause
A/1511/2007
Enforceability of Liquidated Damages Clauses as Penalties

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited in the final order concerning the allocation of court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



                !!!" !##$   %#& !##$



' ('  )  ' )(

*+,  &  -% .,  !##$ 



 !!!!!!!!!!"#$%& !!!!!!!!!!"'()* +    

+

,,       ,   -  "# +$% +.+/)"0+((12"'(''   (

              

   5(&25  

 '  /(  6 0 #% # (/ 7$. ())*"   + 87 # 9:$8 ;50< =  >  0%  0 # #+ ? @#$+%# !!!!!!!!!!0#%#6+A$+B6  #7+#%?$0C$+B# %++%++0.# B+6@+7+9:$8D

@  +$$+ + 6 @+%% @7+ 88%  0%# A# 0++%+#++7BB+$$%#+D

B$%0+##%%$+#'($())4D

@%+A+%()A())4%8++$$+7+#+ +E#@9$$+$0CD

@7+% ?  0"  " #  %0 # (( F+ ())4"  00% # 0#0%##@+++#A8$+##@9$$"60+7 #%++#D

 .##@9$$#G+#+#'2A+())4D

@7#+G+""0#(*0+$.())4"00%#@ #%00+#'($())4D

@7+#<##A8$+H



&(((3&())4  52&25  

  0) (/  ('  )  ' )( 

1.2 ++ 3  4     5 6 -$! )7



  2 +

'H %7.H

 2

(H I#$+"  00+ # I++% +$%" +   #% # (/7$.())*+'($())4H

2H +60%#+8++H

/H 00+#I+H*) "B$0+#6I07+B$ +0%+G+##%#2)A#<+B+00 $$#%#% .B%#%#",9JK9B64"4))/   "+E$0H#%0+G+08%H$%$#+= >#6E+$+6#%+#%.++0# #%++6%D.>E006$+B+$07#$#++ +#%D>0+8+#0%++H,$%$ ++ 0  + %%$+ %$%%  ++ > .> + > 5#"  .B%#%#00+$+<6I #7#%7.H$%$#$+$C # 07" 6 + A+"  6  #% ++6% + I700 # 6%+%E0%#%+;+H'2("')4+')L>H  8BB<  %#+=         MM N, N

 0 B$ # 0%+ G+ + +B% E 0+  6I ,%++ #@ ++?@%$08BB





&(((3&())4