Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/9/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/9/2005 Généré par l'IA

Interpretation of Release Agreement Scope Regarding Non-Signatory Entity

Numéro de cause ATAS/9/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute concerned the interpretation of a release agreement within a broader settlement involving several parties, specifically whether a release clause applied to claims held by an entity that was not a direct signatory to the release, but was related through ownership interests to a signatory. The court reasoned that the language of the release, which was expressly limited to the signatories and those in privity with them, did not extend to the non-signatory entity because there was insufficient evidence to establish a legal relationship such as agency or alter ego that would bind the non-signatory to the agreement, thus affirming the lower court's ruling that the non-signatory entity was not barred from pursuing its claims.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Interpretation of Release Agreement Scope Regarding Non-Signatory Entity: The court reasoned that the language of the release, which was expressly limited to the signatories and those in privity with them, did not extend to the non-signatory entity because there was insufficient evidence to establish a legal relationship such as agency or alter ego that would bind the non-signatory to the agreement, thus affirming the lower court's ruling that the non-signatory entity was not barred from pursuing its claims.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
personne morale règlement du litige copropriété interprétation du contrat contrat de licence longa manu traditio

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article governs the allocation of court costs, which was applied in the dispositive.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               $%&'%$(&$ !$)$%((*

! + !

, ! -, +!   ,+  + 

%.  /0    & "1 %((* 



2 !   -  34 5555555555 ! #   "#$$#%""& $ ' (   !# 



# 

22 + +!   3,+6   !$  "% )#*+,-!



          !  "#

   '/.3'  

$%$#  "45$6#% "##""$" $"$76 $8  9 & '" $"!6  $# # :

6$7 :

##" "#$$"!6 $# # "";$8  9 & :

  $""#  ##" "# $ 7   <   7##" "#  #   7$" $ #% "# $ %$ " $ 32 % /220 ;" 7   $  $$"!$ :

$ ; # $   $" "    #!     " ; #   66"6"" #= .>+/?.23"# " $$7#$   "<;7,$""#$6"" "!$ :

$; # %@%#%A$6"  ;7"< "6"$ " ";  # "# #  A    #; '"  $6"" "!   A #":

 7 B >0 $  #"   #$ $%""  "! ;" !#"   "# $  <;7,$#" <5$ #$) ""$<$"" #$:

7" #!"  #;$$   <;7,$#" <5$ 766""# :



 ./01/./220   '3.3'    + ! 2  ! -, +!   ,+  + 



8/4   9  :   3# ;'%  <=

>B $#"#$#$" "#$7 B>0 <;7,$#"  <5$= .>+/?.23B

/B 6#%   " $  ;7 !  6#% # #     @  $  $" $ >2 <# $-  # "6" "#  " #%%$ $  "C 6$ $  94D"E4#6;" 1 1220     #" A%"B  $"    @  ##5B  %%#" $#" F G "$"; A % ;$""## $"#C "" $$""#  ;: CG A# # ; %# "6 "  "% #!#" $%$     $""#: G #   "5  #  $ #   B 9"  %%#"  # "   #" %  % #   G CG   G "'$  "C 6$ $   #     % "-   # ;7" $! $ "!CB  %%#" $ # % "# #  %#) $ !;"# <#" "";$""# ; 7!#$;  A$"# H B>3/>21 >2?GB     566"F  "$ F       "" CC#"   

#"#6#%$ @  # "6"A """;7,766"6$ $#"566

 ./01/./220