Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/892/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/892/2005 Généré par l'IA

Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel in Property Conveyance Dispute

Numéro de cause ATAS/892/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The petitioner claimed that a ruling in a prior action regarding the status of certain real property rights, which found a certain conveyance void, was res judicata and binding in the current action where the same parties sought to enforce rights related to that property based on a different conveyance, but the court determined that the second conveyance involved distinct property or rights from the first, thus precluding the application of collateral estoppel on the issue of validity, because the prior judgment only determined the invalidity of the specific conveyance therein litigated, not the underlying rights or status of the property claimed under the subsequent, different conveyance.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel in Property Conveyance Dispute: The petitioner claimed that a ruling in a prior action regarding the status of certain real property rights, which found a certain conveyance void, was res judicata and binding in the current action where the same parties sought to enforce rights related to that property based on a different conveyance, but the court determined that the second conveyance involved distinct property or rights from the first, thus precluding the application of collateral estoppel on the issue of validity, because the prior judgment only determined the invalidity of the specific conveyance therein litigated, not the underlying rights or status of the property claimed under the subsequent, different conveyance.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
fortune immobilière chose jugée arrêts en appréciation de validité principe de l'estoppel acte de cautionnement action d'état

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court ordered the appellant to pay the procedural costs.
Généré par l'IA
A/28/2006
Prior Judgment Bars Subsequent Property Dispute
A/1417/2003
Res Judicata Barring Subsequent Property Dispute Litigation
A/1326/2006
Collateral Estoppel Application in Secured Transaction Dispute
A/3915/2006
Validity of Prior Property Conveyances Versus Subsequent Deed
A/2171/2004
Property Conveyance Validity Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the procedural costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               !"#$#!"%%& !'$"!"%%&

((

 () ) )  ()  

*  +  "% ,-, "%%& 



 !"#$%&$''" $ (&$'')$ *%



$

++     ( ,,    !' $"& -./!#$012!3133   34



                 

   71547  

$$'  8$ 9 # '& ' 14 " 1660! :88 $ ' : %'$&;7#<: = 8&:>"$$'$':%'$&'"'& # ?

#'&'3@A1660!: '&&%B:##$8"& 0%1660#:$&&?

#$'3@C$1660!:&$A$&#<' B$ '?

'!#D$'36"1662$&8!'"!& '&##$$%-& E: 89'$$ 8'?

#'&'3."1662!: !A$&:##$$8&:>"$$ '$':%'$&!'&$9%$$$E$&&>&# :&:%$'#$&'$%?

11A1662!:&$A$&$$$'&$E 9$$F':%'$&'366GE"#$'3H"1664$9 $ '&  % $ $$ "#$ ' $$ >"$$ ' '>& ':%'$&?

'&#'.#$"B1662!: &":#9:"#&"$ ':$$:"#$:>$':>>%$$%"1662

:'<##&:'"#$'!&$$$'9'& ##$$$%B##&'$&E"1662?

 '  &#9 ' 36 $B 1662!  $ :$ & E  ##$ ' :$"& $$&%''E:  89'#<' E %$$A$':>>%$'$&$%E"#$'3" 1662?

: %$ '<  ': #' $ $ ' '  '& 8" E  ##$':$"&?





513.351662  74547   (  .  () ) )  ()   

/-,0,   1  2,, ,  34 #5"  6

  0, 

3I &%BI

 0,

1I :'"$ #$"$ $   '& ' :88 $ ' : %'$& ' 3. " 1662  $$ 9: 8 :>"$$ '  $ ':%'$&#$&"$3"1662?

4I 8"'&': '3."1662##?

0I %   E :  # $$ $ % '& $  #&'#$&"':%1662?

2I '" :$"& E %  $  "" ' +I266!77 E $$ ' #$#$E8$'&#?

@I 8"  #$ '  9: #%$ 8"  $  #&$ D$ '  '& ' 46 A '<  $8$ # # ""'& '&  B 8&'& ' ! ,JKLJ89 @! @660   !  $ F"#I  '&  #$ D$ #>&I  "&" '$M = '9 F$"$9'&$'&B$$#''& $$9&? B= F# # 9 "$8  $" #% '"' $$ $ '&? = #$  >$   '  #&$$I ,  "&"  $$ #  $ &&"$ &"&&  $$ = B= $ = 7'!  B8&'&'##$"$<9: '%'&%BI"&"'"$"- ' #%! 9 $ A$!  9  '& $$9& $ :%## ' 9&$&F#&'&$;$I341!36@$36H=I >88<  #&'$     ++ N, N

#8"'#&$D$$$8&F#$9:E:888&'& '#>88



513.351662