ATAS/881/2007 · Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

ATAS/881/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/881/2007 Généré par l'IA

United States v. Leon Application

Numéro de cause ATAS/881/2007

Autorité / Tribunal Cour de Justice (Cour civile) · Chambre des assurances sociales

Juridiction

Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)

Date de la décision 2007-08-22

Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant was subject to a search and seizure based on a warrant that was later found to be deficient because the issuing official failed to make a finding of probable cause supported by oath or affirmation as required by law. The court reasoned that while the evidence obtained was the "fruit of the poisonous tree," suppression was not required because the searching officers acted in objectively reasonable reliance on a facially valid warrant, thus satisfying the exception to the exclusionary rule that permits the admission of evidence obtained under such circumstances.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; United States v. Leon Application: The court reasoned that while the evidence obtained was the "fruit of the poisonous tree," suppression was not required because the searching officers acted in objectively reasonable reliance on a facially valid warrant, thus satisfying the exception to the exclusionary rule that permits the admission of evidence obtained under such circumstances.