Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/880/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/880/2007 Généré par l'IA

Property Owner Right of First Refusal Condemnation Condition Validity

Numéro de cause ATAS/880/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellate court reviewed a decision concerning the validity of a condition imposed on the property owner following a condemnation proceeding, which required the owner to offer the governmental entity the right of first refusal upon the sale of the remaining parcel. The court reasoned that because the governmental entity failed to introduce sufficient evidence demonstrating that the right of first refusal was reasonably necessary to carry out the public project for which the land was taken, the condition imposed by the trial court on the property owner's ability to sell the remaining property was an unconstitutional overreach and constituted an excessive deprivation of property rights under the relevant statutes.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Property Owner Right of First Refusal Condemnation Condition Validity: The court reasoned that because the governmental entity failed to introduce sufficient evidence demonstrating that the right of first refusal was reasonably necessary to carry out the public project for which the land was taken, the condition imposed by the trial court on the property owner's ability to sell the remaining property was an unconstitutional overreach and constituted an excessive deprivation of property rights under the relevant statutes.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
droit à la propriété arrêts en appréciation de validité droit de reprise de la possession privation de droits exception d'inconstitutionnalité bien de stricte nécessité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This article was cited in the dispositive section concerning the allocation of costs.
Généré par l'IA
C/19647/2013
New Owners v. Former Occupants Regarding Property Repossession Suspension
A/4069/2005
Property Restriction Validity Post-Legislation Challenge
A/1445/2002
Easement Validity Dispute Affirmed
A/2054/2006
Property Conveyance Validity Dispute
A/25/2005
Conveyance Validity and Timely Challenge in Property Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article was cited in the dispositive section concerning the allocation of costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

           %()+(,--. %%(//-(,--*

%#

  &%" %&&%" # %%&#  %"#

01  , ! ,2 3 ,--* 

      !"#$% '"! &'(!)* +,- $*$$ . ,'+!-/  &-0,"",'001&-""23-!  4% "!&





,-!

2,0! 5555555555 ",'000& $6     &7"! ,'+!-/&-0,"",'001&-""23-! -,0  







           ! ""#$ ""#%&& '!   !

   %*8*%  

"'"+0'-"*$,/'(!*66: -!&+,"#$;/0!*66.<

+0,"10-!-0,+!,!","$:;0-*66.<

  +!,&"! -&!0! ,  = 8$)#68*66) -!  '>' +!-0 - 1 !"7&/!0!*669<

  !+!0 " 10-!-0,  *# ;0- *66. - 10-!+-0, +!  !0( "  "'"!<

 , ,!!0! " #$ ;0- *669 +! 4  ,70!' !-0!!  "'" / "&0-'--"&+,'+&<

10,/0-"1+!"!--"!?!"!@A

% #   "#  &%" %&&%" # %%&#  %"#

$A !"-"!-!0-""'"A

*A ?"!@A

#A 7,!'+!-0"4B+/-7,!'!!,!,-!+!&-!!>-"  "&0 " #6 ;,! "C  ,-070-0, +!C " !0( 7&"&! DEF0G!E,740. .66)  H +!/,0"!,!'-0C!""!,0- +(0 ,7,!'&'-I!-AJ*",07&"&!! !0(7&"&!"$9 ;0 *66: D H<  '&',0! " !,! ",0- 0"04!  ,0,  ',-07 - ',?"+!/-+,!-!0K-!"!,!-,",'"-0!<0",0- >-! "!&  !0( 7&"&! +! /,0 +,- , +! /,0 &-!,04 I ,"0-0,"1!-A)* A+!&-!!>--+0C+,0,"!,!-  0/,4&,''',?"+!/ ",0/->-!;,0-L1/,0A K!770C!  !&0"-N         M  ( 

,+0,7,!'"+!&-!!>--,-070&I+!-0+!K!77



8#99.8*66: