Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/879/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/879/2007 Généré par l'IA

Statutory Interest Rate Supersedes Prior Contractual Agreement

Numéro de cause ATAS/879/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court addressed a dispute concerning the proper calculation of a statutory interest rate to be applied to an award, where the governing statute specified one method but an earlier agreement suggested a different rate. The court reasoned that the statute, which represented the legislature's most recent expression of public policy regarding interest calculation, superseded the prior contractual agreement; therefore, the statutory method, which resulted in a lower effective interest rate, was the controlling provision.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Statutory Interest Rate Supersedes Prior Contractual Agreement: The court reasoned that the statute, which represented the legislature's most recent expression of public policy regarding interest calculation, superseded the prior contractual agreement; therefore, the statutory method, which resulted in a lower effective interest rate, was the controlling provision.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
taux d'intérêt hypothèque légale mode de calcul intérêt moratoire contractuel contrat de prêt validité du contrat

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/1811/2007
Statutory Interest Rate Superseding Contractual Agreement
A/3568/2005
Statutory Interest Rate Override of Contractual Rate Post-Judgment
A/2419/2008
Contractual Interest Rate Versus Statutory Interest Rate Dispute
A/637/2007
Contractual Interest Rate Precedence Over Statutory Calculation Method
A/1086/2004
Contractual Interest Rate vs. Statutory Interest Rate in Breach of Contract

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

           %()*+,()--. %%(,./()--.

%#

  &%" %&&%" # %%&#  %"#

01  )

! )2 3 )--. 



 !"#$%$  &

&

''     ( )) *      &!" +,- 

            ! ""#$ ""#%&& '!   !

   *$./*  

%#& #& % 

 2*34&5&! 6 " $7 8 $%%- 3 (  9    " (''     ( )) *    2*34  5  # 8 $%%- &  "  $$ ! $%%- & !&& 9!&  36&"   & && "9&:3&!&;33&< 9!" &""3=& & >

 3   $0 8 $%%-  ?@@  @A"  "  &  ## 8& $%%-3&@AA? B6&" 3"B3(&1, 3"  !&&B2*34 53 (B6&">

 (B !! "  "&" B+"  6  " B  !& C "!"C#08&$%%->

& 4%& #&  

 @!"!& : (&D 70 D # &D  =D $    ?B  (?& 8 25 6& E&&9 &&&3"B:F&70 @" "3&?""  &  0&6$%%%2 59&&B:@" " F*B &" #,8#,7,2 5>

!3"&38?  F34&"&6>

(A &!  (& 1,     & !3&  ! 3"! !"  3&A3"& @& !&@B9" &!3&A "&&9"&34B9">

93&3A? "&!3&& 3!3"&B( &9( (6B&"&">

 9  && ( 3 !! "  3& 3 G& &&& & 9( B&&:&(B& "3" 6E&A&& 3&  & && (B& "&!&>

(B(&3&"  " ?  3&8&"3&"B"&" !!9" 8  ">

((34&"&"B&"33!! ":&@AA? @A"3(&D1, !(3&"(B>

*&"!"3&"B"&"&@" 8  " ? >



.$/01.$%%-  *H./*   (@& &&9 & B6&" (& (3433&"!?" "9"&"@A"3@&>

&B6D



.$/01.$%%-  */./*  

% #   "#  &%" %&&%" # %%&#  %"#

!



#D "B6D

$D @!  3&   9F 3B& @!  &  3"& G&   "  H% 8 4  &@& 34  6 @" " 2)=IJ=@900%%/  53B !&4  & 36@!"!&A&D1$ @" " 6@" " #- 8 $%%7 2 '5>  !"!   &  9   !&@ & !+ 3B&3&?& & ! &> & G&  "  6 @" " 3 B 3&  3 B "&9 A  &  (&D /$  'D  3"& G& &  34  3  &B9"!!!+ 3B B&G&8&:(BD  ?@@4  3" &         KL M 6)   

3@! 3"&G&&&@"A3&9F:F@@@" " 3?@@



.$/01.$%%-