Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/870/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/870/2006 Généré par l'IA

Contract Damages Valuation and Foreseeability of Loss

Numéro de cause ATAS/870/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A dispute arose regarding the calculation of damages following a breach of contract, specifically concerning the appropriate date for valuation and the inclusion of certain consequential losses. The court reasoned that the operative date for calculating damages must align with the time of the breach to restore the injured party to their position had the contract been performed, and determined that the consequential losses claimed were foreseeable under the circumstances of the contract, thus affirming the trial court's application of a specific valuation date and the inclusion of those losses in the final award.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contract Damages Valuation and Foreseeability of Loss: The court reasoned that the operative date for calculating damages must align with the time of the breach to restore the injured party to their position had the contract been performed, and determined that the consequential losses claimed were foreseeable under the circumstances of the contract, thus affirming the trial court's application of a specific valuation date and the inclusion of those losses in the final award.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
calcul du dommage date déterminante d'évaluation interprétation du contrat valeur litigieuse durée de la responsabilité obligation de chiffrer les conclusions

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               %&'&(%)(() *%+,(%)((-

*

*!  *"    "

./  & $ 0 1   )((-         !"#$! %  &!'$($ ( ')& !)*"(('+!,       (    ))    )   -...!/ (#$ 01%((",    

         !" #$

   %526%  

$ 2$ '"78/5445! !'$($' )*"()& ! ##("#(1"9 ):%'1   );!  #'$((! "9 "#" /( , <(  # , 8 "  #'( "/" " ((= >9 9(  ++( '( "  >  #'*! ? ) !/">/((/$"'(#<.777,@(5444! 9/('/$(( )% ","#'(!> (*(//($01#($($++($=

9/($,"$(#! ))    )   -...!:% '1  ;'1">9#'*(++$!+#$  )> +( " 9#'* /( $($ '$ ' 80#( " < " '#1 (  .4 8( .77A! +#$ ' B( "   " 8(  56 '(#< .777= >"''$"+(!'<($"("C0     " (/ ( " /#( " % ,   " #'( #< , 9DD   ) ) )  D  ) C0$ "  >"(= >9  (($ > 9($$ /( (/$ ' ? )   >"(= >  ((   /( '"( ' $($ /$  ' 9#'*  '  #  +(= >9  '     #'( "/" " 9($$ > >9 / " 9DD   ) ) )  D  )$'(("/$,E("+(=

9$C0"'"9(/(!  )(9DD   )D  )=

9+!'"54'(#<544F!$($#"#(( <"$,>/($($(+$$"G++.@(5446!9H((" #'("/""9($$#'($(+(=

5F'(#<544F!9($$+#$>9/(<((+(=

      >9($$<((+(=

("1"/<8(=

G/("G'"(("*"E=

GH(#"G(IA3!I5((I+"G%/(//( : );!''<'0:(IF7 ;!(><((0" "(  #<#( "  + ( "$'!  > " H "  #"(! "  #+H$'80(#B#"#"G('H'$#( +#$": D ".#.774 II;=



2.3.425445  %626%     (  "(  #<#( " "$'  /( "  $0( +$"$! #B# >  '$" (  <8(! ' (( >  C " 1 " '1  8(+( : D ..4  3J! "I 5=   .7A7! 'I 6.A! "I5<;=

((G'1!"1>(<(>("'($ =





  "*3  *!  *"    "

$

41 5 // 6  7        8 9 &-) "#:

.I "(">(<((+(I

5I ((>("/<8(I

6I "# G(#$ , /  (  ## " A44 +I! , (( " '('(,+("$'I



 0++1  $"(     %  K L   

'+#"'$(B(((+$H'(>G,G+++$"$ "'0++





2.3.425445