Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/870/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/870/2005 Généré par l'IA

Property Tax Assessment Challenge and Valuation Burden of Proof

Numéro de cause ATAS/870/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The situation involved a challenge to a property tax assessment, where the petitioner claimed the valuation was excessive and disproportionate to comparable properties, violating constitutional guarantees. The court reasoned that the burden of proving an assessment was illegal or erroneous rests on the taxpayer, and while evidence showed some disparity in valuation ratios, the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the assessment made was so arbitrary or unreasonable as to violate due process or equal protection, particularly as the taxing authority provided a mechanism for review that was utilized.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Property Tax Assessment Challenge and Valuation Burden of Proof: The court reasoned that the burden of proving an assessment was illegal or erroneous rests on the taxpayer, and while evidence showed some disparity in valuation ratios, the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the assessment made was so arbitrary or unreasonable as to violate due process or equal protection, particularly as the taxing authority provided a mechanism for review that was utilized.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
estimation fiscale immobilière fardeau de la preuve du contribuable appréciation arbitraire des preuves autorité fiscale procédure d'estimation révision de taxation

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was used to order the appellant to pay the procedural costs of the federal court.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               #$$%%#$&&'  #()&#$&&'



 *  *     *

+, '

" %$ -.- $&&' 



 !!!!!!!!!!"#$%& "  " ( $'()%(##$*%(##+(  ,%



(

  - -- ,   "(.%%"). ($% /0"/112  



            !"

   ,131,  

   # !!!!!!!!!!" '%(% '  " (  #%  ''(#14$1004#,$#  -5

%(#'(5

((#(#16'($71004"(.%'#'  -" '8('$(($'$(9#%'5

   / * *  *     *

"

0.-1-,, 2  3-- -  45 %6$ *!7

/: #(#((#5

1: ;#<5

6: (8'%#(.((:  .99=  %#(A             >? @ ;      

'9$#'%(B(((9%C'('.99





311//31004