ATAS/868/2004 · Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

ATAS/868/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/868/2004 Généré par l'IA

Extrinsic Evidence Admissibility in Contract Interpretation

Numéro de cause ATAS/868/2004

Autorité / Tribunal Cour de Justice (Cour civile) · Chambre des assurances sociales

Juridiction

Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)

Date de la décision 2004-11-02

Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party sought review regarding the admissibility of extrinsic evidence to clarify an ambiguous written agreement, specifically contesting the exclusion of testimony from individuals who negotiated the contract regarding their understanding of a term. The court determined that since the contract language was susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation, the trial court erred in refusing to admit extrinsic evidence, including parol testimony, to ascertain the parties' true intent at the time of contracting.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Extrinsic Evidence Admissibility in Contract Interpretation: The court determined that since the contract language was susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation, the trial court erred in refusing to admit extrinsic evidence, including parol testimony, to ascertain the parties' true intent at the time of contracting.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA

interprétation du contrat dépositions des parties preuve libératoire vérification par le pouvoir adjudicateur partie au contrat contentieux contractuel