Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/867/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/867/2007 Généré par l'IA

Timeliness of Statutory Filing and Jurisdictional Requirements

Numéro de cause ATAS/867/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerned a dispute over the proper interpretation of a statutory requirement regarding the timeliness of filing certain procedural documents, specifically challenging whether a condition precedent for court review had been met. The court reasoned that the filing deadline, being clearly stated in the statute without ambiguity, was mandatory and jurisdictional, meaning that the documents were not timely filed; therefore, the lower court correctly dismissed the matter for lack of jurisdiction because the statutory prerequisites for judicial review were not satisfied.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

& # .//0, 4!&# # .//0, +--+.//0; Timeliness of Statutory Filing and Jurisdictional Requirements: The court reasoned that the filing deadline, being clearly stated in the statute without ambiguity, was mandatory and jurisdictional, meaning that the documents were not timely filed; therefore, the lower court correctly dismissed the matter for lack of jurisdiction because the statutory prerequisites for judicial review were not satisfied.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
respect du délai de recours incompétence ratione materiae condition légale objet du litige contrôle juridictionnel notion de document

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
& # .//0
4!&# # .//0
+--+.//0
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
,: & # .//0

This provision is cited in the dispositive section regarding the dismissal of the appeal.

,; 4!&# # .//0

This provision is cited in the dispositive section regarding the rejection of the further complaint.

,+--+.//0

This provision is cited in the dispositive section regarding the court fees.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

           %&''%())* +%',*%())*

--+

. +-/. +!  .- !/

 0 1  &2 3 ())* 



   !"#$#%& ##% !%   '!%(%# 



%#

)*   ** # %# % !  * 



           !" #   $

   1.+.1  

  !   # $$ %   ./ !2# .//3 # $# )*   ** #4%$# 5#6'#5%' %4 % $#7 1$#8##%9

##,-:& #.//0

#!$')*   ** ,;4!&# #.//0

! %#<!=##%4 %#%%# # 2!#!$ >

%%>'%#! %%# 8# 4# # 2>'# =$#!%$#!#%%=> %#<!#?

' & %'$##%%#<##?@

-  !+/4  +-/. +!  .- !/

,@ #%#%# %##@

.@ <#?@

;@  %>$#!#%6#% %@

 6#44 8#  #! %B         *<&  ) A     $ 4#$#!%##C%%% 4 !D$#% $#6#44



+,--+.//0