Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/866/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/866/2006 Généré par l'IA

Validity of Agreements Despite Asserted Statutory Limitations

Numéro de cause ATAS/866/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge de l'autorité
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns a dispute over the validity of certain agreements, where one party asserted that the other was barred by statutory limitations due to prior actions in different years, specifically referencing statutes from 1995, 1997, and 1999. The court reasoned that the applicable limitation period for the current action was not governed by the earlier dates cited by the defending party, determining that the limitations asserted did not apply to the specific claims being adjudicated. Ultimately, the court upheld the validity of the agreements central to the dispute, finding that the asserted defenses based on earlier statutory deadlines were inapplicable.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Validity of Agreements Despite Asserted Statutory Limitations: The court reasoned that the applicable limitation period for the current action was not governed by the earlier dates cited by the defending party, determining that the limitations asserted did not apply to the specific claims being adjudicated. Ultimately, the court upheld the validity of the agreements central to the dispute, finding that the asserted defenses based on earlier statutory deadlines were inapplicable.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
délais de prescription validité du contrat délais légaux conflits de lois accords particuliers décision d'extension

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This article governs the allocation of court costs and was cited in the dispositive orders.
Généré par l'IA
A/1505/2005
Contract Validity and Enforceability Dispute
A/2632/2006
Contractual Indemnification Validity Versus Statutory Limitation
A/1105/2005
Contractual Validity and Enforceability Dispute
A/1727/2002
Contract Interpretation and Validity Dispute
A/247/2004
Contract Enforcement and Validity Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article governs the allocation of court costs and was cited in the dispositive orders.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               !"#"$!"$$% &!'%%!"$$%

 &

 & ( (&(   ( 

)* +  ", -* "$$% 



 !"""# $%$& '    )!)* !()*+#*"!!"",#*-*) .  /""



!*)

00     , 11  2  ") "*"# 3!&4 (!*5%6 $%$$   $7



             

   2%852  



8%7%98%99:  27852  

  #""!  ,;;" *!  ,)2"+""*# <"2()= , >  %$ !+?)%997);*,!*)!",)*@A

 ,!((!"*"! ;!)# ()  )"=)  () ,"*)#"")  ! !"   $& B+")%995A

#""!, %5"%99:)B**,!((!"*"!,)#A

  )!) "*)B*# () ,)#  )()#*# () ! *")   %: B" %99:  !*@,*"!#""!, *)+!"@)")  (!)!(#*,"*)*"!*!+#""!A

#""!!*";"#@)!)*$%(*?)%99: !"C# )"?  #  D B!)  () C ,   #  #""!  %4 !+?) %997 * %5"%99: * ";!)#,)#C,")()"*,"*)*"!  @ ,"C!+#""!))A

!"#)* C ! ,)*E 67 E 7   !" )  ()*" F##)  )!"*  )!":!*!?)%999< > BC,@,+!"!()#+"@,*!)"*#  )!)  ,)) (* )!"#))  #""! !  #""! ) !((!"*"! !*)C)!)#*#;!)#A

  !+ #""! !"* D*) !*";"# @ ,)# * !"C# @ ,*!)"*#  )!)A

   ) !G  #""! !))(!  *! (!"* H !"!   )!)* "3"!**)C!+#""!*;""*"FA

  )!)*  C" !?*"* *";*"!   )!"* @  ""*# @ *"*)  #(  ;"H#,(=@699;)E







8%7%98%99:  25852     &.  & ( (&(   ( 

 

/0121** 3  -11 1  45 6%"  7

$E )*!+#""!)(), $%(*?)%99:E

%E #))!)!?B*E

7E ! ,"*"# @ (3) @  )!)*  !  699 ;)E @ *"*)  ()*""(*"!@;)"*#(E

5E 3)IE

  F);;")  ()#"*         /"    "         

!("!;!)()#*))D**!*";"#H()*"""CJ@J;;";##) )!"()F);;





8%7%98%99: