Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/861/2008 • CJ GE ATAS/861/2008 Généré par l'IA

Withdrawal of Appeal Against Unemployment Insurance Decision

Numéro de cause ATAS/861/2008
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige struck_off
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party filed an appeal against a decision on objection issued by the unemployment insurance fund following an initial adverse decision. Subsequently, the appealing party formally notified the court that they were withdrawing their appeal because they were also renouncing their initial opposition to the fund's decision. Therefore, the Cantonal Social Insurance Court acknowledged the withdrawal of the appeal and ordered the case to be removed from the court roll.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal Against Unemployment Insurance Decision: Subsequently, the appealing party formally notified the court that they were withdrawing their appeal because they were also renouncing their initial opposition to the fund's decision. Therefore, the Cantonal Social Insurance Court acknowledged the withdrawal of the appeal and ordered the case to be removed from the court roll.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
assurance chômage retrait de l'opposition suppression de la prestation d'assurance chômage caisse d'assurance projet de décision en assurance sociale

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Although not explicitly cited in the numbered dispositive, it is standard practice to apply the costs regulation when the case is struck from the roll following a withdrawal, but since the dispositive explicitly mentions only two points (taking note of withdrawal and striking the case), and no procedural or substantive provision is cited there, the output remains empty based on the strict rule of citing only provisions explicitly mentioned in the numbered orders.
Généré par l'IA
A/3725/2017
Appeal Withdrawal Against Unemployment Insurance Decision
A/4161/2020
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Unemployment Insurance Decision
A/1452/2018
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Unemployment Insurance Fund Decision
A/903/2016
Unemployment Insurance Appeal Withdrawal
A/2933/2024
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Unemployment Insurance Decision

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Although not explicitly cited in the numbered dispositive, it is standard practice to apply the costs regulation when the case is struck from the roll following a withdrawal, but since the dispositive explicitly mentions only two points (taking note of withdrawal and striking the case), and no procedural or substantive provision is cited there, the output remains empty based on the strict rule of citing only provisions explicitly mentioned in the numbered orders.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

REPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENEVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/2305/2008 ATAS/861/2008

ARRET

DU TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES

Chambre 3 du 7 août 2008

En la cause

Madame G_________, domiciliée c/o H_________, au Petit-Lancy recourante

contre

CAISSE DE CHOMAGE SYNA, Office de paiement 57/040, rte intimée du Petit-Moncor 1, case postale 11, 1752 VILLARS-SUR-GLÂNE

Siégeant : Karine STECK, Présidente; Violaine LANDRY-ORSAT et Christine KOEPPEL, Juges assesseurs

- 2/2 -

Vu la décision sur opposition rendue par SYNA, caisse de chômage, le 5 juin 2008, à l'encontre de Madame G_________,

Vu le recours de cette dernière du 25 juin 2008,

Vu le courrier de la recourante du 26 juin (recte : juillet) 2008 indiquant qu'elle renonçait à son opposition, et par conséquent, retirait son recours;

Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS, LE TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.

2. Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière La Présidente :

Yaël BENZ Karine STECK

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le

A/2305/2008