Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/86/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/86/2006 Généré par l'IA

Validity of Arbitration Clause Due to Alleged Lack of Mutual Assent

Numéro de cause ATAS/86/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A dispute arose regarding the validity of a contractual provision mandating arbitration for all disputes, with one party claiming the agreement was void due to a lack of mutual assent on that specific term, arguing they only agreed to a general forum selection clause. The court reasoned that the evidence demonstrated the parties intended to be bound by the entire agreement, including the arbitration clause, and that the clause itself was clear and unambiguous; therefore, the party's subjective misunderstanding or later objection did not invalidate the clear written manifestation of their mutual assent to the contract as a whole, upholding the contractual obligation to arbitrate.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Validity of Arbitration Clause Due to Alleged Lack of Mutual Assent: The court reasoned that the evidence demonstrated the parties intended to be bound by the entire agreement, including the arbitration clause, and that the clause itself was clear and unambiguous; therefore, the party's subjective misunderstanding or later objection did not invalidate the clear written manifestation of their mutual assent to the contract as a whole, upholding the contractual obligation to arbitrate.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
validité de clause compromissoire clause obligationnelle créance contestée annulation du contrat concordat ordinaire règlement du conflit juridictionnel

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision was cited in the final order concerning the allocation of court costs.
Généré par l'IA
A/3820/2005
Arbitration Clause Validity Versus Contract Validity Dispute
A/13/2007
Arbitration Clause Validity and Scope Dispute
A/3647/2007
Contract Arbitration Clause Enforceability and Unconscionability Finding
A/1568/2002
Arbitration Clause Validity and Unconscionability Finding
A/4469/2007
Enforceability of Arbitration Clause Despite Prior Defective Agreement

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited in the final order concerning the allocation of court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

                 

!!"

 ! #$ %##$ " !#%" % $"

%&'   (  )*  



"+ %,,,,,,,,,, !"#!$%%$$  &#!%%'(!  ) *    %

 -# # "#".$" "# -/"! "!##" ."#$"."# 0# %"" !%+ !,-.-,/,,   /0 !"#!$%  ! %$$&#!%%'(!  ) *    %



! 

-- %" %##$ " $1!#%" #/$  "  $!$# %1+2!3/.,/,,   ,4



       

   )/5/)

 #% 6

& 7!% 8  %/+%#9 /--.%$!: 5,2/;5-4<6

%$% !$%%!$ %4- /--3!4,="$ /--.6

> %$! "!  !$= ?&$"$!%&!# $ 6 ! %" . - $" ! #$ %##$ " !#%" % $" ( 3445   6 745+5'' 8 39  : $;< ,@ !A8  B ' %?& !$   @

/@  ! A &  %  ?&$   %#$$ %! !   ! %   %#$$ %&! $ %  !!$       #%C)!D# !$? %$#     %$ E! 9 A &E! FFFFFFFFFF A   % ! $E G$ $9  $!$ %  !@ ,+   ! ,-   %  $  %#$@

4@ >1%!!?%9$@

3@ !G !$%?%#E" %  !!E$G#A2.-E @

.@  $!$ % > !@ .-   $E    !$ %  ?> "! E     !    #!  7! %  %#$ % 4- =  %H  !$E$!$   $ %# % #  $9 E#%#  %   BDI$J DE?$ 0 0--3   ! $G$ @%#$!7!  C#@#$ %$!K< $%$? G!!?%#$$  !%#$ 9!$ $! % %#$$!!?#69<G  ?!$E$!$"$ %% !!!  %#$$6< ! $C! %  #!!@B$#$ !$!   ! $ ##! ## #  !!  < 9< ! < $)%  $9 E#%#  %       !    !$H       ?>$ %"  %#   $ "9@  #$  %   !$     1 %  " ?$  ! =$! $$ ?  %#$$ !!?# ! >" % ?   #!# G#%$#  !: !@,4/,-0!,-;<@

 C EE$ K  #$%!K

$  B 9B

$E % #! 7!!!$E$#G !$ C EE

54,,45/--.