Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/844/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/844/2006 Généré par l'IA

Vehicle Equipment Violation and Fourth Amendment Stop

Numéro de cause ATAS/844/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellate court reviewed a trial court's refusal to suppress evidence obtained during an investigative stop, where the initial stop was based on the detaining officer's observation of a vehicle traveling with a license plate that appeared to be dangling or loosely attached, which the officer suspected could be an equipment violation, and the court found that the objective facts known to the officer—the physical appearance of the plate suggesting an equipment violation—provided sufficient, articulable suspicion to justify the initial traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment, irrespective of the officer's subjective motivations for the stop.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Vehicle Equipment Violation and Fourth Amendment Stop: The appellate court reviewed a trial court's refusal to suppress evidence obtained during an investigative stop, where the initial stop was based on the detaining officer's observation of a vehicle traveling with a license plate that appeared to be dangling or loosely attached, which the officer suspected could be an equipment violation, and the court found that the objective facts known to the officer—the physical appearance of the plate suggesting an equipment violation—provided sufficient, articulable suspicion to justify the initial traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment, irrespective of the officer's subjective motivations for the stop.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
violation des règles de la circulation preuve objective séquestre de moyens de preuve infraction à la loi sur les armes acte d'usurpation ou de trouble inspection locale

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was used to order the appellant to pay the procedural costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



            !"#$ %&&$  '"" %&&$



() *)+ + ( )   +

,-. /  %# 0-. %&&$ 



 !!!"#$%%& ' ( () (

 )(

''   '  '   !)!" !()! ( ) *+,-. )#/## 0

            

   3/1$3  

  "!!  ( .. !)!   #0 ( /%%0   ''    '   '   4!3.(5  !6 .( 7 3!  "("!((89: .. !)! ; (" )(: .) )!)!   ! '1 1 <

( (:("//8(!/%%0<

")(!)! :!)!"/-!/%%0<

:! .()! .( .()!#$.)9(/%%0<

 : ( !)(8 )(  .()!  (  )) !  ( = )( 7.()! ) 87!!)>  #? .).@(. ( ) ) .)   #:02# ;(? 2% A )!)(   )!)!  . (  ."(!   B8!( /%%$ A .)9(/%%0"!"*")$% ) 9(/%%0? /? !.))) . ( ) ) .)A)!)( )!)!  . (  ."(!  )! " A  !)!  7   )) ! .(8! B7:$% ) 9(/%%0? $? !:CCA8 @(")) .). ())()) ))) ."(!  )!)! A( () .C": .!(9)! 8()? -?  @)=")! )((C).()!( !).(! 8 !(:A:)(. (."(! B8!(/%%$A.)9(/%%0A)!)(  )!)!  !?



1#-201/%%0  3$1$3     1 + *)+ + ( )   +

 2334   0

53464-- 7 28 /$ 9 +:

#?  )A( ()7::CCA.@(. ( ) ) .)     #:02# ;(? 2% A )!)(   )!)!  . (  ."(!   B8!( /%%$ A .)9(/%%0"!"*")$% ) 9(/%%0?

/? D@ ))79 !?

$?  )A:!)!"7:.) #:02#;(?2%. (  ) ) .)A)!)( )!)! . (."(! B8!(/%%$A.)9(/%%0 A !)! 7 ))!.(8!B7:$% ) 9(/%%0?

-?  )A:!)!"7::CCA8 @(A( ()"))  .). ())()) )))."(!  )!)!  .C":  .!(9)!8()?

,? !)7.( "()C()!)?

0? ..!)! D()?,% !; (.()!7D.8); (( ( ( )(.(")((+)"!$%B (5 )!;!)! .(.! ( "(" (!9;""(('*E!F(* ;7!00%%-   )( !=.!(?"!.)+)(.(  C"?" !( !)> 6!!7(=))7"!! ( ()"!( 9)!(!). "!! ))7"<96=. (. (7 )!;!)!. 8 !(()) )("!! <6. ()(!C)(  (.("))?'!" !(  )!) .  )( ! "") ""("   ))( 6 96 ) 6 !3  (!9;""((. ((.)(()!5((( (7D! 8("((!((89?" !(( ()! ( ( @  .(8 7! ( ) B !) !! 7  "!!  ))7" ) D8 ..  7")"=."!"( ()4()?#$/#%0)#%&6?    C(;;!5(> ("!)>       '@8! G H @  

  .!  ; (  .(") ((+) )  )!;!" = .()! ) A :;;! ;""(  ( !.(C(;;



1#-201/%%0