Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/841/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/841/2006 Généré par l'IA

Arbitration Award Enforcement Challenge Based on Exceeded Authority and Contract Misinterpretation Upheld

Numéro de cause ATAS/841/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party challenged the enforcement of an arbitration award, asserting that the arbitrators exceeded their authority by considering issues not explicitly submitted to them, particularly concerning the calculation of an agreed-upon payment structure, and that the award was based on a clearly erroneous interpretation of the governing contract provisions. The court held that while the arbitrators were confined to the scope of the submission, their interpretation of the contractual provisions and application of a relevant formula, even if arguably mistaken, did not constitute an action exceeding their authority or demonstrating grounds for vacatur, because the method used was arguably within the permissible range of interpretations of the underlying agreement, thus affirming the award.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Arbitration Award Enforcement Challenge Based on Exceeded Authority and Contract Misinterpretation Upheld: The court held that while the arbitrators were confined to the scope of the submission, their interpretation of the contractual provisions and application of a relevant formula, even if arguably mistaken, did not constitute an action exceeding their authority or demonstrating grounds for vacatur, because the method used was arguably within the permissible range of interpretations of the underlying agreement, thus affirming the award.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
arbitrage interprétation du contrat exécution moyens invocables arbitrabilité valeur litigieuse

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision governs the allocation of judicial costs, which was applied in the final order.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



                !"

##$!

 !# %& '%!%& $ #%'$ ' &$

'()   *  +,+   



  !"###$!%&'(   !")*+ *"*+ ,$+#""##-$+.+*   *#





"+*

/       !#*"#+#*"0 #! #+#$ 1# "#%&!)"+!%'''2

      

   7&037  

)*"$*8

*"*%&,*#&''6!*$)"&&#&''6+)#9"#*8

:#")*+#"+#*%3;#&''68

)#9$#")$+#*)*"#+<++"#")**"*+8

$="#+#"+$)*)*+#!+!)*"$>+!)*""=+#"$# "*$<-#+#$)"*$+*#*<",8

"#"-"**#)*)*+#=*??&6)+@*&''68

++>-#",#+-+$*#*+"*>#++*#+#=A

# '$ -! . &$ !# %& '%!%& $ #%'$ ' &$

* /,,+   0

1,+2+)) 3 /4  5 &67

%A " + < /           >- -== < )**  1*=?*#$#B+##+$;"*#9**+#",-#+*,+#" @#)*  4;,#*&''5+-C++*,#>#-+ #,#;>-<*)*#<%''D!#B#)*9-#+*,+#"!")"+ *$+@#+++>"#A

&A #"+>--==)*+##*<*@"**)*+##)+#"B ?*# $#B )"*  )*++#" *,+     "+    *#+$;<>#++$)*9$")+$?##+#?"-*+AE% A

3A #"+>--==<*@"**<   ?*#-B)*+#6?$,*#*&''6*  /F%-'''A7+?*# -B)*+#%E#&''6*  /F%-E5'A7

4A :G"++>@"#A

5A "+<  >-*"<+"+##+$ )*"$*A



0%3450&''6  73037   6A #+>)*"$*+=*+#+A

EA ))#+#":*+A5' !#?"*)*+#>:),+?"** *"*"+*)*$+C+$#3';"*9"+#?#+#")*)# *"$*$ *#@?$$**!1H#I*1"?>#6!6''4   !+*"#B)#*A$#)+C+*)*""=$A$"#*"#+J K##>*B++>$##"*"*+$#*"@+#*#+) $##"++>$8@KB)"*)"*>"+#?#+#)","#**++ +*$##"8K)"*+*#=+*""*)*$++A#$"#* "+#+ )  +*"# $$+ $$*$ " ++* K @K + K #7!  *#@?$$**)")+**+#9***"*>:# ,*$**#,@A$"#**"*+#"*"*"G  )*,! ># *"+ ;"#+! ## >  $##" ++>$ + :,"))  >$+$B)$#$*"*+L*+A%3&!%'6+%'(KA    =*??#*J *$#+J       #  @

")#"?"*)*$+C++"+#?#$B)*+#+<-??#)*=*??





0%3450&''6