Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/841/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/841/2004 Généré par l'IA

Contract Waiver and Enforcement Appeal

Numéro de cause ATAS/841/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The reviewing court considered a dispute concerning the validity of certain contractual agreements and whether the trial court erred in its findings regarding waiver and enforcement. The appellate court reasoned that the record supported the trial court's determination that the party asserting contract provisions had effectively waived their right to enforce those provisions through their conduct, which included prolonged inaction and inconsistent assertions, thereby concluding that the lower court did not err in its application of waiver principles to deny enforcement of the specified clauses.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 68 al. 2 LTF; Contract Waiver and Enforcement Appeal: The appellate court reasoned that the record supported the trial court's determination that the party asserting contract provisions had effectively waived their right to enforce those provisions through their conduct, which included prolonged inaction and inconsistent assertions, thereby concluding that the lower court did not err in its application of waiver principles to deny enforcement of the specified clauses.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
validité du contrat renonciation au droit exécution contrat d'enregistrement clause compromissoire contrat de droit administratif

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the court costs.

Art. 68 al. 2 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the respondent for the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               $%&'($)& $+&%$)&



, ", -  ,- -

./  -0 1 ! %+ 21 )& 



! 3333333333 



- -   -  ""%+ !"#"$%""# &'()*!

              ! " !#

   1/,)1  



  23%  % 4!"" # -5 2" /00- # "6 # 4%"* ""63##7$ 89999999999+-:2"-;;<= 4*>89999999999?

  23% # "6 # 4%"* " # -. $+!" /00. 4@  #"! # +4A 9999999999  9999999999 + 9999999999  "6  3#7"+4#7$ 8=>%9999999999?

7'# #2"#/4%6/00.+$:6/00. #% 4"% 744 # >8 9999999999  $"% 7"6" #  3##7"+4#7$ +"=>%9999999999?

  #+""  44"" #  "  3!" # %4" B"1 4*C   D # /. 2" /00) +% = >8 9999999999  "" # "$%""@4$" 844+"##%"/00.=2!"/00) "%#$8-E50081?

   # >8 9999999999  "6  #  " # 5 2"/00)"#"FF7"""F%=""#7%#$8 )0081?

  ! #+"" #    # -- G /00) +%    ""#$8<00814#A"$%""!+4%"# !%6#+%6/00.2!"/00)?

  " # "6 # + # -: G /00) #%#   # 7"$%"!#+""4+"+"#""$"?

76#+4#?

-    F   "2+  %4 " #!  2"#"" %4+ #" ' "#++ %% !6 B8 (<  8 /   #  "  E3""2#"""#//!%6-;)-1D?

7 $$  $" F    " # =   #+"" ""+ #+""  44""B7".5#"%#"$"""$%""#/)2" /00) ""!"#744""7+4!"3=7+4F# #+""""3"D"'4+2#""6?

7"H+F"#7%"*?

  78 . 8 -  / #  "   " $%"" # - % -;;< B ID42"="46++$""#4""3#



,-)(.,/00)  1.,)1   #7  4" $  "  A 7"+ 4   "   %7"#%"*4+4#+#6?

774*#*%"#!%6/00."#*%"F""!"7+ $:6/00.#7'# #2"#/4%6/00.$"% 7"6"#3##7"+4#7$ 8=>%9999999999 7!"4#"A"$%""$!#$"?

 " #A 4 2" =  " %4" = 7+3# # %'% $  #""#7"+4%"#"A4"44"4##4""+C D =  4 F"   3# # 7$? 6D =  4 F" A 7"+ 4? D =  4 F" %  " # %"* 4+4#+  #6?

78-/8/ I"4@#"#"!'"+?

""74#%#+F"F++4H++"# 6$"F%#?

7 +F 7 = 2 " F    "  +%+ #  ! #+""#--G/00)B##7"$%+%=78<:8/#  "   4+# #%"""! # -/ 4%6 -;5( 1  D  % # $8<00814#=""#"$%""!+4%" #!%6/00.=2!"/00)?

7$"    4  4+!" #  6 $" #*  F7"   "#23%# #2"#/4%6/00.?

7!#F"4+*#2+8



,-)(.,/00)  1),)1  

 - 4  ", -  ,- -

! 25   6  7   8# %.) 

  5 

-8 +!6?

! 5

/8 28  3$$"*C  +"#C   H  +">   

4"$%#4+'"$"+A4"43$$





,-)(.,/00)