Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/840/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/840/2004 Généré par l'IA

Contractual Unilateral Modification Enforceability and Consideration

Numéro de cause ATAS/840/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court addressed a dispute concerning the enforceability of a contractual provision that allowed unilateral modification of terms, where the challenging party argued a lack of consideration and manifested assent to the changes. The court reasoned that the continued use of the service after notice of the changes constituted acceptance under the contract's terms, and that the provision for continued service, even if the opposing party did not explicitly agree, was supported by consideration flowing from the performance of the contract's core obligations, thus upholding the validity of the unilateral modification process.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contractual Unilateral Modification Enforceability and Consideration: The court reasoned that the continued use of the service after notice of the changes constituted acceptance under the contract's terms, and that the provision for continued service, even if the opposing party did not explicitly agree, was supported by consideration flowing from the performance of the contract's core obligations, thus upholding the validity of the unilateral modification process.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
contrat unilatéral contre-prestation contractuelle dette durable notification d'actes validité du contrat déterminé clause compromissoire

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court applied this provision to order the appellant to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/1706/2004
Contractual Unilateral Modification Enforceability and Consideration
A/1936/2006
Enforceability of Unilateral Modification Clause
A/4550/2006
Contractual Unilateral Modification Notice Sufficiency
A/960/2004
Contract Modification Enforceability Dispute
A/4365/2005
Contract Modification Validity and Consideration Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court applied this provision to order the appellant to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               "#$%&"'%%( "$)%"'%%(



+ *+   +* 

&,  - .  '$ / . '%%( 



0 1111111111 



  2  34 2  ##() !"#$%&'

                 !

   /.*./  

 0#1!23333333333+%4.%%$56  )##77##  # 8'# 9:(8 ..;# .%%$#0 #56# (#) 9:(8<

   6 #  (7# 7  7#  += 7(" .%%$  #  8'#  9:(8  )) 16 '# )# ) 6>  # (#)    6  )1  )## ##8#<

 #62?% #0) )7#8))  #  # -".%%%@ A<

*  5  *+   +* 

 6070   8  /00 0  9! #&' 

+2 56##() ## 6 )## ..;#.%%$ 6 '> # (#) 9:(8<

.2 6> (1 "#<

=2 77## 62?% #0(7# 167'0( 7)B  )# =%; &#0##77# (( ) ) #"0) ) C9D#E901#--%%$   #F(7#2 )#7B78)2()(# #G A# #1F(1 )## )#"##7   )##1)<"AF771(#0##(7'# (   )##<A7#8 7)2C#()(# # 7  # ))( )())   A "A  A #/   #"0) ) 77(#&16# ' )#'"2()(# (#(>  7' 1#  ;# ## 1  )## 1)  6'77  1))F7) #)@2+=.+%-+%HA2  800#&G  )# G   >C )#! 

 7#0(  7) B#0#)F7#C)# 6 5 6)(#7800

 *+,%-*.%%$