Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/839/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/839/2004 Généré par l'IA

Confidentiality Agreement Scope in Acquisition Negotiations

Numéro de cause ATAS/839/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The situation involved an appeal concerning the scope and proper application of a confidentiality agreement that restricted the use of proprietary information shared during acquisition discussions. The court reasoned that the restrictive covenant, intended to protect confidential plans and strategies shared by the disclosing party, was enforceable because the information conveyed was specific, non-public, and critical to evaluating the potential transaction, thus justifying the imposition of a temporary restraint on the receiving party's competitive activities even after negotiations ended.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Confidentiality Agreement Scope in Acquisition Negotiations: The court reasoned that the restrictive covenant, intended to protect confidential plans and strategies shared by the disclosing party, was enforceable because the information conveyed was specific, non-public, and critical to evaluating the potential transaction, thus justifying the imposition of a temporary restraint on the receiving party's competitive activities even after negotiations ended.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
devoir de confidentialité convention de diligence achat exclusif pourparlers étendue et durée de la protection secrets d'affaires

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court ruled on the distribution of costs because it was cited in the dispositive.
Généré par l'IA
A/3649/2006
Confidentiality Agreement Breach Over Publicly Available Information
A/1250/1999
Confidentiality Agreement Breach and Proprietary Information Disclosure
A/1798/2005
Confidentiality Agreement Breach and Enforcement
A/4409/2005
Confidentiality Agreement, Non-Compete, and Non-Solicitation Enforcement Dispute
A/1468/2001
Confidentiality Agreement Breach and Proprietary Information Disclosure

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ruled on the distribution of costs because it was cited in the dispositive.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               !"#$%!&%%'(&() *!+$#!&%%'

,,*

 *, - -*-  ,-  

&.  /0    "# 1/1 &%%' 



  2222222222 





  -*- 3-)    -* - ()*  !"#$%&'



             

   0-+.0  



- - 4 *

 1 *((  11((  ,- 2 -//$  (  3'(  )1(4(01&(56()*%7)78888888888 *)1 ./ 9(-//$(*)1()  :: ))(11() (6 )1 ((;

(1 *((**(6(*%7)78888888888,. 2-//$<=*>('((%('((**)(<= (*1(1& =66(1  ,?2-//$;

1( * ,@1)>-//$)('A*11,?1)> -//$7)78888888888 *((11((;

=('(*% *)((%=('>((* 1   ('*11( #>-//$B



- ,-* - , *

=: )  =( ?/   (   1( 3**  (   (   ( " *1*   ./ 9 ('  (6((   *((;

 *())( )( ))((=( ,@B, (3'(1*  )(((';

==1(A**(*%1  ,?2-//$ *(  ./9))() (,@2*!() (,#1)>;

= *1   %  1  ,? 1)> 7) 78888888888  3(  (');

 0(=('<1 )(6% ('*)( &3 '( (*1(% 1  ,C1)><( (11(& (;

=*<('>B

DDDDDD

 +,-.$#+-///  0.+.0  

,  * 4  *, - -*-  ,-  

5/161   7  811 1  9 ":& ;

  61 

,B *('>B

 61

-B (<1* 3(

$B 6)  1(   <= 1' 6)    1* "   *(  ./ 9 &  (6(( 1 1( )) *  *  (> 6* *   E!F(G!6<( ? ?//$     ( :)1(B  *(  1 " 13*B  )*)( (H 5 ( (< :)< *(( *(>((1  *(( <*; >5 :1 1 < )(6 ( () 1'( )    *((; 5 1  (3     1*B E(  )*)(  ( 1  ( **) *)**   5 >5  5 (0   (>6* * 11)(&<=( ' *('>B)*)( )()A  1' <(  9( (( <  *(( <*  ='11  <**:1* (*4B,.-,/?,/C5B

  366(H  1*( H     (( >E          1( 6)  1* "  (6(* : 1(  % =66( 6* *  (1366

 +,-.$#+-///