Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/834/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/834/2004 Généré par l'IA

Guarantee Calculation Dispute

Numéro de cause ATAS/834/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute involved the proper calculation of the amount owed under a guarantee agreement, where one party contended that the calculation method used by the other party deviated from the agreed-upon formula based on certain specified financial performance metrics. The court reasoned that the governing contractual language clearly mandated a specific, objective formula for determining the liability, and since the evidence demonstrated that the defendant's calculation failed to adhere strictly to this defined methodology, the plaintiff's proposed calculation, which correctly applied the contractual terms, must prevail.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Guarantee Calculation Dispute: The court reasoned that the governing contractual language clearly mandated a specific, objective formula for determining the liability, and since the evidence demonstrated that the defendant's calculation failed to adhere strictly to this defined methodology, the plaintiff's proposed calculation, which correctly applied the contractual terms, must prevail.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
mode de calcul garantie d'exécution responsabilité contractuelle règlement du litige calcul de la saisie obligation de chiffrer les conclusions

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court orders the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

                  !"

#$%

 

%  & &%   

&%#

  '(') 





*$+# $% ,- # . +((     !"!#$%& '()



 '(

'(  ////////// 



   

   -$*"-



(./'01 0!(2$%%,1( 3-'45 '(  '(66666666667

''' 89' ( ' $+ :'$%%,1(-'(0' (8(8'((7

0;9<0('('1=01 07

   (((   '( 6666666666  , ' 8( $%%, 1( .  0( ( (>;  ((. ( ?'(' '9'1((' ' 1 '  1 ( . <;@1' (38 (  3 ''   ;  (( <  02> 0'0 (01(<( 1''7





*!!+!*$%%,  -"*"-

  # 0$ ,  %  & &%    &%#

  1'.

!A 0((8(./'01 0!(2$%%,1( 3-' 457

 1'

!A  '0?(.<( >;  (( ('?'( '9'<99>(''(3 '';  ((?'(0<02>0'0 (01(<( 1''7

$A <B 3''.8 7

"A '.<C'1 0<3'07

,A &'03 3'"%?(A'?( (8(8'((>;'( $D%?(A>;(90?(7

DA ? (31('.<1'? (3(( ( '(1(0'((/'  0  "% 2 ( =   '?'  1( 1 ( 330 (0  (8 ?00((5;EF(; ?.GG%%,  '( )31(A  0  1' /'( 1(  90A  303 (  'H I .( )'3' . 0   ( (' 0( 8'(   ' 1   0  ''.07 8I )1 (1 (.3 '?'31  (3('''(0 7I1 ('(  9'(      (1(0''A 5  303 (   '' 1  '(  003' 030(0   ''( I 8I ' I -  (8 ?00(  (  1 (( 1 '((  3'=( (  ( ( .< ( 0(( ((8A303 (( (3' ( (3 B1(. ( '2 '.0 ''.0'< 11.0'0 )100( ('J('A!"$!%G'!%#IA



  3 (8 (8'( (

9(??(H (0'H  K  &    



1 ? (3''0 0'0 33.0)1('



*!!+!*$%%,