Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/833/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/833/2006 Généré par l'IA

Statutory Mandatory Minimum Sentencing and Vagueness Challenge

Numéro de cause ATAS/833/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute concerned whether a statute providing for a mandatory minimum penalty applied to a defendant convicted of a specific offense involving controlled substances, where the defendant argued that the statute was unconstitutionally vague and that the mandatory minimum infringed upon judicial sentencing discretion. The court reasoned that the statute was not unconstitutionally vague as its language provided sufficient notice of the prohibited conduct, and furthermore, the legislature acted within its constitutional authority by establishing mandatory minimum sentences, thereby limiting judicial discretion in sentencing for that particular offense.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Statutory Mandatory Minimum Sentencing and Vagueness Challenge: The court reasoned that the statute was not unconstitutionally vague as its language provided sufficient notice of the prohibited conduct, and furthermore, the legislature acted within its constitutional authority by establishing mandatory minimum sentences, thereby limiting judicial discretion in sentencing for that particular offense.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
pouvoir d'appréciation du juge fixation de la peine limites légales infractions contre la sécurité des rapports juridiques défense obligatoire atténuation libre de la peine
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
&6

This procedural marker indicates the basis for the dismissal of the appellant's procedural submission in the final orders.

-6

This procedural marker indicates the dismissal of the appeal on the substantive merits in the final orders.

26

This procedural marker indicates the order regarding the distribution of costs in the final orders.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               %&'()%&) !%+,,%&)

!

 !  "!  " " 

"-.  & $ &) /.  &) 



 !"#"$%$#"& &' ()% *) "*"% ')%')))"+," 



*%"

++    +  +++ !("""( )%)$ -.!*%/0123!4551+ 6  





            !"  #$

   :&7-:  

!!  0 !

#"$))*&."&559!*/)"$"*##*)%)*-5;)&559!) )%)$/)<$*%)%)*&55&"*"%"(=%%%=)$#% %*)%)*/)>"%)?@

  * "*"  &1 ;)% &559!  "*"%  =%)*  %% $))*@

A$)$%$/)<$,=)%)$18#%("&559#*""$#*"%$#*"* *)"@

#"#)11#%("&559!=)%)$)/*"$ ")(!#)B,=##)!?*)" "*)$"$  $))*! % *%%$ C  "? #*" &55& "?)% = %)?)%$ $#%!=%)?)%$)$#%=>%$%$<"$CB/)&55&%@6

" !   !

A< %"  A"%6 8-   *) /$$" "  #"%) D$$"  "*)%  "*)E F!A"#%"*)$""$))**$))*" *##*)%)*;CA,A?*)*#"$?) ")(@

%%A#B@

A?A%)*$))*!"*"?)%*(;%@

A)*?)%">""G6



7&.897&559  :-7-:  

 " 2! 0  !  "!  " " 

$

345.. 6   /     78 9)& #:

16 "%$))*"#"A)%)$11#%("&5596

&6 *%%C"*"%?*(;%6

-6 >"G6

26 /*"  #"%)   CA #?% /*"" "*" *%"  #"$% ""H%   $)  -5 ;*" B  *%)/)%)* #" #) "*$ "$  ")( /$$"  "! +0I)J"0*/C) 9! 9552   !  %"*) <#)"6  $)  #% H%" #"**D$6  $*)" *)%K F ))C" <%%C$))*"*"%$)"*(%)")%#$))* %%C$@ (F <#*" #*" C *%)/ ) %) #*?*)" " %% %" $))*@ F #*"%"  )D%" *   * "#"$%%6 +)  $*)"  *%)% #  %"*) $$% $$"$ * %%" F (F % F ):!  ")(/$$""#*""#%""%)B"""*"CA) ?"$"")""?(6$*)""*"%)*"*"*>  #"?! C) "*% ;*)%! )) C  $))* %%C$ % A?*##  C$%$<#$)$"*"%E"%61-&!159%153F6

  D"//)B"K  #"$)%K         LM N (+ *#)*/*"#"$%""H%%*%)/)$<#"%)#"D"//



 



7&.897&559