Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/830/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/830/2004 Généré par l'IA

Contract Termination Severance Enforcement

Numéro de cause ATAS/830/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case involved a dispute over whether a contract provision governing the termination of an agreement was enforceable, particularly concerning a requirement for the non-terminating party to pay substantial severance. The court reasoned that the termination clause, which was clear and unambiguous on its face, constituted a valid agreement between the parties regarding the consequences of termination, and absent any overriding public policy violation or other grounds for invalidation, the express terms of the contract must be enforced as written, including the required severance payment upon the specified notice of termination.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contract Termination Severance Enforcement: The court reasoned that the termination clause, which was clear and unambiguous on its face, constituted a valid agreement between the parties regarding the consequences of termination, and absent any overriding public policy violation or other grounds for invalidation, the express terms of the contract must be enforced as written, including the required severance payment upon the specified notice of termination.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
résiliation de contrat théorie de la dissociation exécution politique des salaires séquestre conventionnel clause d'effectivité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision was used to decide on the allocation of court costs.
Généré par l'IA
C/26139/2001
Severance Payment Dispute Based on Contractual Terms and Proof of Fault
A/295/2004
Contractual Termination Clause Consideration Dispute
A/1830/2002
Contractual Breach and Termination Dispute
A/1001/2004
Contract Termination Dispute and Post-Termination Obligations
A/783/2004
Contractual Enforceability and Severability of Liability Clauses

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was used to decide on the allocation of court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               #$%&'#())* #'+)#())*

,,

- , -   -,  

*.  /0 1  () 2/21 ())* 



,  32 2 /2/4  5 /2   ! ()(* "#$%&&#'

+*

6666666666  (,-(*

                 !"

   !#.#!  

(  -3 4 5* *46 ( #0 +7 #&&%    8+(3+ +39 ( 4+()(,)39,(:+55+33+-+*),5*;;;;;;;;;;  <5+*3+&%/2$/$%=+<4(,-(*+3+(), 53)(/$>#$1-*??53,*6?#?@(A/1)3#&&%-*3(5+*3 ()33*3-B

(,-(*,,393,<(,*)3*B

5*+3*(/*++ *#&&%()(*3-+*), *3 (, 4  (,-(* 93 5C,  +3, (  ( < :--3 ( 5+*3 ( A9B

:+,4()()39,(:+55+33+5+936*,+ -*3,9<D*"((,-(*B

:9(435*,A(3C3(+*433"(9+ EB



,   3  , -   -,  

 /272   8  922 2  :" $;( 

/ ,*()(+ EB

# 345*+,(*"*3B

F C(*G  "*--3*H  *,3(H   =3(  I  3        



+53+-+*)(5*,6+3-3,J5*3334:<:--3-,(,* (*+35*"*--



./012.#&&%