Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/822/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/822/2005 Généré par l'IA

Attachment of Security Interest in Accounts Receivable Conflict

Numéro de cause ATAS/822/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute centered on whether a security interest attached to a debtor's accounts receivable, which were subject to an earlier security agreement granting a security interest in "all of the debtor's accounts." The court reasoned that the later agreement's language, which granted a security interest in accounts described by a specific contract number, did not explicitly exclude the previously secured accounts, and thus the security interest attached because the general description in the later agreement reasonably covered the previously described collateral, rendering the earlier filing valid against the later interest for those accounts.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Attachment of Security Interest in Accounts Receivable Conflict: The dispute centered on whether a security interest attached to a debtor's accounts receivable, which were subject to an earlier security agreement granting a security interest in "all of the debtor's accounts." The court reasoned that the later agreement's language, which granted a security interest in accounts described by a specific contract number, did not explicitly exclude the previously secured accounts, and thus the security interest attached because the general description in the later agreement reasonably covered the previously described collateral, rendering the earlier filing valid against the later interest for those accounts.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
conflit d'intérêts compte numéroté saisie de compte bancaire séquestre d'immeubles concours de responsabilités émission de valeurs

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               !"#$%!"&&' (!%""!"&&'

(

) (* ) (+  )  + *

,-. '

 "% /-. "&&' 



 ! "



"

#$ $$    %   $$  ! "./ &' ()!(*+,  -



           

   %+0)%  

  0 1 3./+24"+,,2'&"  5'/"6''/'. 78

9  ://  .; 6 & 95;"  . < '= ..">?78

 :  ' +@ 4" +,,2!  5 ' /   .:"  '/  (2 A" +,,2 :  ".""  '/  ::" ""B/  : '9&5"/'8

"9":C/"/''/8

  ++ :".5 +,,2! 9"./   D 9&5"/ '  " 5'." D  4" ' % &  :.  ' .E. / :'"'&" 5'/8

9"./".."&/B99&":9""''/ ":.'::/''4&D.+,,2!B"3" 954"'.."'@4+,,28

   B  9"F G( "F5 '   3/'/   :" ;// ' 'G"5+,,,< ?!9"''""C:/ "'3""'."3&B/B8

9C".'"".E.':"!9"9":3.D=;! 5 .:""  '/ &5  " : .5  !  9&""B9'95&"!/"/8

99!/":'B"'/""B/8

5""'.'' 5'/!"9:3' '/.:"8

 ' H"!  &" ' 9"F 2G F (  !   '/  ::" "::4""D8

9 9:=! 9"./ 9 : '  '/  ::"  .E.  :.='/3.!D"'.."B9'/" @4+,,2!..""B'.5&8

9&'B:/='!'"E"'//&58



0+1(*0+,,2  %)0)%     +(*2  (* ) (+  )  + *



340-- 5  /   67 $8" +9

(F /&5F

+F "B:/'";""F

)F 3.  :" '  B9 :&" 3.  "  :/" E" '  '/ ' ), 4 '=  "3" : : ..'/ '/  5 3/'/ ' ! $IJKI3B G! G,,L   !  " C.:F  '/  :" E" :;/F  ./. '"M ? 'B C"."B'/"'/5"":''/ ""B/8 5? C: : B ."3  ". :& '.' "" " '/8 ? :"  ;"   '  :/""F $  ./.  "" :  " //." /.//  "" ? 5? " ? %'!  53/'/'::"."=B9 '&'/&5F./.'.".N ' :&! B " 4"!  B  '/ ""B/ " 9&:: ' B/"/C:/'/"<"F()+!(,G"(,*?F  ;33=  /'"M             OP Q N      

:3.':/"E"""3/C:":;33





0+1(*0+,,2