Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/817/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/817/2004 Généré par l'IA

Liquidated Damages vs. Actual Damages in Breach of Contract

Numéro de cause ATAS/817/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The matter concerned the proper assessment of damages in a case where a party failed to complete a transaction, specifically dealing with the interpretation of a contractual provision regarding liquidated damages versus actual damages. The court reasoned that because the contract explicitly set a liquidated damages amount and the aggrieved party failed to demonstrate that this stipulated amount was an unenforceable penalty or that actual damages significantly exceeded it, the stipulated liquidated damages were the appropriate measure of recovery, thereby affirming the award based on the contract terms.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Liquidated Damages vs. Actual Damages in Breach of Contract: The court reasoned that because the contract explicitly set a liquidated damages amount and the aggrieved party failed to demonstrate that this stipulated amount was an unenforceable penalty or that actual damages significantly exceeded it, the stipulated liquidated damages were the appropriate measure of recovery, thereby affirming the award based on the contract terms.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
dommages-intérêts contractuels défaut de la chose restitution de la propriété préjudice financier imminent liquidation d'une Sàrl qualification du contrat

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal procedure.
Généré par l'IA
A/1762/2002
Contractual Breach and Liquidated Damages Calculation
A/2781/2006
Contract Dispute Over Liquidated Damages Enforceability
A/1924/2007
Contractual Interpretation of Liquidated Damages Calculation
A/2495/2006
Liquidated Damages vs. Penalty in Real Estate Contract
A/646/2007
Contractual Penalty vs. Liquidated Damages Calculation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal procedure.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

     

      !

"#$%

#& "'&( $( #% &"$% $(%

) * +,+-  ./  $0 -

  

+) 12222222222 



$% $(% 3%%% #% $ % ''()   ! "#$ %&



   12222222222 )  

        + ,-.+

 )  4 1  ,0 2' ,00# 34 56666666666    '7    ' 8 9   )''  ''  ,/ 2' ,00#   '  :&'  (*' ;'+*% <   =    *)  *'': >>) *   ?   // @ ,00#$      2   ?

 )  + 19' &'  *)7  *)' 1  ' :&'  9:'' 2'''  ,, &(7 /A#/ ;=  )) ('>')  19 '7    '  )) '') %  / @ ,00.$   ' '1$ ((   ' '& 8  ' >))  9+ &''  &'&  ,0 )(7 /A#B ;>4 4 /$ 4   "B$ 4 /$ 4 $  4 / = ? 9 &  94 C/ 4 /   '   *) ('''&  /, *(7 /AD" ; =$ 9') * $ 9>>'   1!$ 9    '   '' 2''1  *'7 9! >>) * 9'   *) ?  )''  &'    7 ? 9 9$  *) *)  ):( 3( 56666666666$ ) 6666666666$ %  19 *   *)  *'': >>) *   '&( E &  E+)*E 56666666666 ? 9'  2'>' % $ 9   3( 56666666666 ?

-/"#"-,00# + .-.+

" $% 5 (% "'&( $( #% &"$% $(%

6,+4+   7  8++ +  9, . (:;

/4    3( 56666666666 ? ,4 (('1 8 3( 56666666666  *'%  ' ? .4 (*'  )' 8 3( 56666666666  " &(7 ,00# *  *    ? #4 >(  *'   1F *& >(    *) !   )'  /0 2 %  '>'' * *' (() )  '7 >))  $ G H'I >1' B$ B00#   $  ' E(*'4  ()(' ' < = ''1 E( 1 )''   )' 7'  '  *   )'' 1)? 7= E* * 1 ('>   '( *&' (   )''? = *  ':      *)4 G'  ()('  ' *  ' ))( )())   = 7=  = '+$  '7 >))    * *   ('%    1F' & ) '&74  ()('   ('   (J  *&$ 1'  2'  ()(' F' F:'  *'%  *'  4 G ):( 2'  ()('  )'' 1)  F&  1   )) E*)')   ;4 /.,$ /0B  /0D =4

 :>>'% <  )' <

J G )' 3 

 *' >(  *) !  '>') E *' '' 1F8 F>>' >))   ' *  :>>

-/"#"-,00#