Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/812/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/812/2004 Généré par l'IA

Oral Modification Validity in Face of Anti-Oral Modification Clause

Numéro de cause ATAS/812/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A claim asserted that a contract provision requiring mutual written consent for modifications was invalid because the other party had allegedly allowed the claimant to make oral changes without objection over a substantial period, implying a course of conduct overriding the written terms. The court reasoned that the contract's explicit anti-oral modification clause was controlling, and absent clear and unequivocal conduct by both parties demonstrating an intent to waive or abandon that clause, the written requirement for consent to modifications stood, leading to the conclusion that the alleged oral modifications were ineffective.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Oral Modification Validity in Face of Anti-Oral Modification Clause: The court reasoned that the contract's explicit anti-oral modification clause was controlling, and absent clear and unequivocal conduct by both parties demonstrating an intent to waive or abandon that clause, the written requirement for consent to modifications stood, leading to the conclusion that the alleged oral modifications were ineffective.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
validité du contrat décision communiquée verbalement modification du jugement modification de la demande consentement tacite clause de légitimation
Généré par l'IA
A/1392/2003
Oral Modification Enforceability Despite Written Notice Clause
A/2781/2005
Enforcement of Written Notice Requirement Despite Oral Modification
A/1819/2002
Contractual Written Modification Requirement Enforced Over Oral Waiver
A/1487/2002
Contract Validity and Modification Dispute
A/1452/2002
Written Contract Modification Enforceability Dispute

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

     

    !"#$%!$&&$ !'"$!$&&%

(

) )* *+*  )* +

, "- ./ $&&% %0  1 /

  

  ! "#$# "  %  &!  '#$( ()  #$ (* $

$

+22 *+*  3)**4  ( + ,-!  "$ ./0! 1/11 23 4 $*#

            

5 /645

,  5   ,

   )  1, "$*8 1,,- '$ (' $ "2 ( '99 $ :3 ( '53($# ; )! " (# ( 1< =3 /77/! $ 99     $> ('3($# ( 177? ( 1 3*8 1,,@  47 3*8 /777! " ( 07? (2  1 (#*8 /777 ; )A ($ ( 1< 9#3 /77/!   $=$#  $ ($ (#; )'"2  3 (#8##  (  # ( /- =$ /77.!  8 ( #  9*#  $! "  ( /, =$ /77.! )A $($ "#( B  9*$  "= $   *"$  (# "  9 "$ (  83$ $ $!   #%#$!   ; )! " $$ ( /1 "$*8 /77.!   (## $   ;C )A 3$ ( "( $ (  $$ $ ( +  #)   ( DC

610/.6/77/

5 4645

6  +2  )* *+*  )* +

 .5   7  ,  , 38 "9$ +

1C +   ( DC /C $ )  "#( $ :$$C

 :99 E  : ""#$ E F(     5   

 " 9* ( "#$ G$ $ $9# > "$ "  :99

610/.6/77/