Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/807/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/807/2007 Généré par l'IA

Contractual Benefits Calculation Based on Historical Statutory Rate

Numéro de cause ATAS/807/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A litigant challenged a finding that they were not entitled to certain contractual benefits based on a calculation used by the opposing party, which was derived from a statutory formula involving varying percentages applied to a base amount tied to the year of the underlying agreement. The court reasoned that the statutory language clearly mandated the application of the specific percentage corresponding to the year the agreement was executed, regardless of when the benefit was ultimately paid or calculated, and therefore upheld the lower court's application of the correct historical statutory rate to determine the entitlement.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contractual Benefits Calculation Based on Historical Statutory Rate: The court reasoned that the statutory language clearly mandated the application of the specific percentage corresponding to the year the agreement was executed, regardless of when the benefit was ultimately paid or calculated, and therefore upheld the lower court's application of the correct historical statutory rate to determine the entitlement.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
calcul de la prestation droit aux prestations dommages-intérêts contractuels prix de l'ouvrage calcul de la saisie de salaire réalisation des conditions matérielles

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Cited in the dispositive order to rule on the costs of the federal appeal.
Généré par l'IA
A/447/2006
Benefit Calculation Dispute Over Statutory Interpretation
A/881/2006
Statutory Interpretation of Minimum Benefit Calculation Dates
A/928/2007
Statutory Interpretation Regarding Retroactive Application of Benefit Calculation
A/1948/2005
Benefit Calculation Dispute
A/4641/2006
Statutory Interpretation of Benefit Calculation Baseline Dates and Economic Index Adjustments

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Cited in the dispositive order to rule on the costs of the federal appeal.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



           #$%&'#())% *#+)%#())%

*

 * *     

,-. '

 $$ /   ())% 



  !"#$%& !'( !  )"(  !*"(  +(   ,

 !  !"#$$- . /0 !'()"(  !*"(  +( .  1

(

23224 ) !#5 2  "6 

          !   "

  $0&  

 0*

#9  :;!(  $ )!< $%%-  #-=! >!<  <  '!= ('" ( !;(("?6")#?@-A ! B(;C' ! "#?&&( " #?-89

$9 2  >66 -  '(6  :;!( '"("  <  '!= ( "'(;'!(" ) '"),'6 D'> "'E (!;9

59 :;!(  ) ( ) "6(6& "!<$%%-( "(" (! *66 < "5!$%%7'E"( '(;9

89  < "(" '(! ((( '"), '('"((( "6 '( !!D !(( ) '(D (!;((?6") #?@-(& "!<$%%-9

&9  )(;( !" '  <  " ( '! *"(<  6( )(F

C *;( ) '"),  ! F

•     2322 4  $% : $%%7  !  ( 66" '=   4 ( ()     2   !!("  ''"( *!!< ! (   "; 4 (   2  =) (( 9 '  #  (< #???9 ')(  "(( "   (( 9  (' 9  . ;  # :( #??%  5% '(!< #???9  '((  < ';  88*$-& 69  "(" (6""  (  5% '(!<#???(($&#8592'(( <';*"=)A ?-*$7$69& "!<$%%-9

•  ( )  '"), * ' G( ()" )(  (( '"("9

<C *;( ) '"),  ! F

•     2322 4  $8 ! $%%7 (  E  !  ( 66" '=   4 ( ()      2   !!("  ''"( *!!< ! ( "; 4( 2 =) '#:)#??@92'(( (!!(  )*"=)A$@*#-#6992! ('""

    0#7-80$%%7 50&  

D**)('("'= *(((( '"),)( #:)#??@9

-9  !(("("(!E'( ( $7:$%%79: (   D"D) '"),A'(;(*")(A ?-*$7$69 '  !  ( A $@*#-# 69 '  !  ( D*A "6( *<)( *#%:($%%7G(( ((<9

79 *< *<:(  "6E""("; "A:;9

 *

#9 *(9$& 6" "<'; '"),'6 )))(() (" #7 "!<#??5B4C("); #:)$%%%=;'"   )9D:(( ' H '(( (A'(;B(9#$$(#$5   )I C :;   )!'"(( *(9759# 6" " '"), '6  $& : #?@$ BC ( A =)  < (  '#J($%%5 ('=D*66  "("(!B(9#8$ CE"( *66'(;<  "  "'(( "(!"':;  )9

$9 2*(9$$4B)(); '#:)$%%%C  )  '((  ( D (  !; ( '(;" 6!"!( E(9#$$#$5#8#(#8$ K(95A& 4*''D( ';!((A(6"B9#C9>D:('((  (A'(;' A 66"('(( (;!("  )  < '; E(( ")(!(  !!(  ) (  '(( (;!(" ) <';E((")(!( !!(  !;B69(9$84C9:( A  '((  ( ( A *)  < '; E((  !!(     !;  ("G(   !!(  ) B 4 #$@  $5%K 4#$?888C9

 H'=  :;  '!= (   "  '(; ' !("  '((  ( D (  !; '  ! 9  ( '(( ( H '(   !;  ? 6") #?@- H( '(  & "!<$%%- (AD:;!(  )( )E"(9

59 2  !( ' (  '(( D ' (  !; '  ! *"=)A?-*$7$69 (!("(8@*#5-6)(A*EI"'9 (A ! '(( <';A'(;( $@*#-#69

    0#7-80$%%7 80&  

(  !(" ( #8*%@% 69 &% )( A *EI"'E  ("G( ,( ":A "(" " '  (((  '"), "6 9  "D  !  (A EI"'!(( 58*%&& 69&%B8@*#5-I#8*%@% 6 &%C9

89 6!"!( A  :'  '  : "(!( '  '(; :D*!!( (6( '(( (  !:( )"<""6 (('(( (A ("G(!'( !(( I9 ("G(("(E!!!";*(9#$ * '"),'6)))(() ("  #@ ) #?@8 B $C    (E ";!(  I ( '" B 4#$?$&& 95C9

&9  "!!(   'L  '"  "(( ;(( B(9 75 9 $  ( @?.9# '"  !(() #$'(!<#?@&C9



MMM



    0#7-80$%%7 &0&  

  1*0  * *     

#9 )(  4            2   A (6" !'(  ((!! 58*%&&69&%6)  ! !'()( '= *D ("G(!'(  "( = & "!<$%%-:D*!!( (6(9

$9 H, !((D <9

59 (D'" (;((9

89 6!  '(   DH ')( 6!  (  '"( G(   "  5% : =  (6( '=  < 6" " B2>NO>6D--%%8  C') !(=  ( '<6!"!(E(9@$ 6" " <6" " #7 : $%%& B 4CK  !"!   (  D   !(6 ( !, ')('(;( ( ! (K ( G(  "  < 6" " ' ) '(  ' ) "(D E  (  *(9 8$  49  '"( G( (  '=  '  ()D"!!!, ') )(G(:(A*)9  ;66=  " (F         2,) . /   

'6! '"(G(((6"E'(DHAH666" " ';66

    0#7-80$%%7