Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/794/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/794/2006 Généré par l'IA

Statutory Compliance in Contribution Collection Dispute

Numéro de cause ATAS/794/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge de l'autorité

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A petitioner challenged a lower court's decision concerning the interpretation and application of a statute relating to the collection of certain required contributions, arguing that the lower court erred in finding their actions compliant with the law regarding notice and timing of payments. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling, reasoning that the statutory requirements for notice and filing were met by the petitioner's documented procedures, which demonstrated substantial compliance with the intent of the law concerning the calculation and submission of the disputed obligations, thereby supporting the initial determination.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Statutory Compliance in Contribution Collection Dispute: The court affirmed the lower court's ruling, reasoning that the statutory requirements for notice and filing were met by the petitioner's documented procedures, which demonstrated substantial compliance with the intent of the law concerning the calculation and submission of the disputed obligations, thereby supporting the initial determination.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
condition légale droit des obligations action en paiement obligation de versement supplémentaire de l'associé cotisation interprétation du droit

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited in the dispositive to rule on the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               "#$%&"#''% "()*"#''%



 +, ++,  +   ,

-. / ! &$ 0. #''% 



 !"""#$!"%  %!%(  &  '





!(%

  "("#



            !

   &)$*&  

!  1 2! .!%# /%((%)+0")--+  %!%1!(%2!(%#""!,30")--+1 /%#"%4(!%"(##"( &"(0!"%56(%!%7

6#(#"2"(# /%((%%!#,80")--+ %"9# 5 #":%/%#"#(/%("2%(50!"%#""!((4# #" #;#(,+!<()--+7

%!%(6(/=#(##"7

!  3 2!6=(%6%(>+,!".##%%/%(":##% %!"(  % !"  + !(!9% )--- ? @   /%!#% 2(  %"9 (!  % ( %#:# /%  %!"( (!  " 46 !"( ("."%==":##%#=((%5"(("/!"("!7

/%!#%!"(!((A(%"/(%/"?(>@(46(%!% !"( !("%  =/!# "(  ."( (  !(". "2!4#  "" 4  !"!7

65 #.(  " 6( 6( / !.!% 5  %B:   %"9 "/%("(  #" !29  %!%( /!% !9%     62%("( 46  6"!9%2("! %!%%#%(#?(>9@7

  ! 6%(> 8C    !" %  /%!#% ""(%("2  ,) /(9% ,C8D ? @    !  %!% !( %#  = =/"%  %"9 (!%!"(!"2(!/!%(% !(%#":("!/%#" /%(" =/!#"(."(!!("."2!4#(!"!?>,@7

6=(%6%(>8C>) #""!((4#(/"B"2!4#!( 50!"%%!%7

"((%!#!"%!(/!.!%5%B:  %"9"/%("(  #" !29 5 ! (% /!%  !/#(%  ""4( 46  6"!9%2("!!%!%%!(#%(#?>*@7

6 6!%%   ((%  )+ 0" )--+   %!%(  ("."( / = !"("!%29""(#/%#"(#7

66/!/%#/!#"4 %"9#""/%(" ,+!<()--+7

6"EB!%"!((%4%!%("%%29>



$)*+,$)--+  &*$*&  

  4 , +, ++,  +   ,

!

56313.. 7  033 3  89 &%# , :

,> #%%!%"%%29>

)> "(4/%!#%(:%("(>

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

!/"!.!%/%#(%%A((!("."#=/%("/%:%..



$)*+,$)--+