Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/788/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/788/2007 Généré par l'IA

Employment Contract Termination and Non-Compete Enforcement Refusal

Numéro de cause ATAS/788/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A dispute arose regarding an employment contract termination and subsequent non-compete enforcement, where the former employee, who signed an agreement containing a non-compete clause, subsequently established a competing business. The court reasoned that the non-compete agreement was overly broad in its geographical scope and duration, making it unreasonable and oppressive to the former employee's ability to earn a living, and thus refused to enforce the restrictive covenant, particularly in light of evidence suggesting the former employer had already breached the employment relationship first.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Employment Contract Termination and Non-Compete Enforcement Refusal: The court reasoned that the non-compete agreement was overly broad in its geographical scope and duration, making it unreasonable and oppressive to the former employee's ability to earn a living, and thus refused to enforce the restrictive covenant, particularly in light of evidence suggesting the former employer had already breached the employment relationship first.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
résiliation de contrat prohibition de concurrence rapports de travail exécution compétence spéciale en matière de contrats de travail entente illicite

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court ordered the losing party to pay the costs of the appeal.
Généré par l'IA
C/22976/2011
Employment Termination and Non-Compete Agreement Validity Dispute
C/14638/2007
Employment Termination and Breach of Non-Solicitation Dispute
C/19973/2021
Former Employer v. Former Employee (Non-Compete Validity)
A/1444/2004
Enforceability of Non-Compete Covenant
A/1001/2004
Contract Termination Dispute and Post-Termination Obligations

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the losing party to pay the costs of the appeal.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

            ! " !!#  #"" !!#

$$

%& $'(&) ) ) % &$) '

*+  ,  - . !!# 



    !" # $

 $   ! #

%$

$%&'()*   +  ,   !6$ -$./012%0'30444 

*    ,, 5,, 2%  

                

  1"8  

) /'

9& $ :/%  9($ 1447  (; <=$  $ =  2$ ;$ %2$! >$!  93??% $!9388@5!% %$ !% 7: 933?&

1& < 66$' 2 % 6:/%2$! %! $ =2$ ;$ % !%A2$% $$2$%/$2$ % !2$%%  $% 5 % %% 2$!>B5!2&

0& :/% >$>!6  % 69( 1447!%!%$ 566   $ =!18 14472$A!% 2$%/&

8&  $ =!  %!2$% $CD % %% CD 2$!>B2  %$2! % %% !6$2$ %   @$  %%  > $  @  2$  %!$! $%  $ / %%$7: 933?%9( 1447&

(& ,5/ %$E% > %$>$@55> %2 $%% %5F/1(%$ /E %22$@5 !%! 66  !  9$ :  9337  04 2%=$ 1444 G  ,,  H+   ,  , H ,, ,  , H I   #C JD@> $ %!%! %$6!$! G  6%   2$!>B ,  % @5  5!> %  9(   1447G*$&94'5811&3(&

?&  % % !%! %$  A 2$%   %  14 :  1447&  :$  % $  @!@5G!6%5=$>% $2$%$$K%$ % $$%%=&

7& 5=5=:% ! 6 A!!%!/$!G:/$&

) %$'

9& 5$%& 1(     6!!$ $   =$ 2/   2$!>B 2$6 >  $> >%% >  %!97!=$9330C*D %$!  > /$  9$ :> $ 1444 $;/  2$!$     >$& $@: %%2L$$2$%% $% G2$%/$ C$%&911%910  > E D:/  >$2!%% 5$%&70&9 6!!$$2$!>B2$6 1(:  93'1CD %G;> $ =%$ 2  9$M%1440 %2$;@566 $ !%!%$ C$%&981 DA!%$

    "141'"1447 0"8  

566 2$%/$=!$!2$% % !%$ !2$:/  >$&

1& ,5$%&11*C>%$> /$2 9$:> $1444D  >$2$%% $% @ $%$ /%2$%/! 6$!%A$%&911910989%981 N$%&0G(*522 @% 2$/ %%G%$6!$$C&9D&$<@: %2$%%   $%  G 2$%/$ $$2 G   66!$ %$  2$%%   $%  /%!  > $   =$ 2/ A %% !>%%  %   >$%2$%% $% /%!> $ =$2/A %% !>%%% $ /C6&$%&18*D&$ :%G2$%% $% %G5> $ =$2/A %% % $ / %!$K%% >$ C *91'104N *913888D&

L2;:/2$ ;$ %$!2$%/2$ % !  2$%%   $%  @  $%  $ / 2$  $&  %2$% %%L2$%$ /7: 933?L%$2$% 9( 1447%G@:/% >$%>A!% $&

0& ,%2$ % 5>;$@5> $$5!;>G 94'5811 6$& 3(  %!$K% B% !:G !%! ! 2$  % %%   2$!>B !6$&    $  % G  AE!2A  %%(851996$&(4&

8& 6$!% G  :$ 2$ 2   :$ !%$ % 2$  2$%/ :@5 %  %$6$%   2$%%   $%     $  : %  >$! =!!6   $  %% 2$%%   $ % G  %!$K% 2% $ $  %%  E &  %!$K% % !  %A   !/5$%&915$$2$!>B2$6  >   $> >% % >  %!  9' >$  93'8 C 1D    %A $!/% $    E  % 2!$ $ C *  2= !  0?"41  9' : % 1440D&

(& !%$2$O2$!$!%%/$% %C$%&70&1% '3J&9 $2$!$  %$% >912%=$93'(D&





    "141'"1447 8"8  

$  0 '/  $'(&) ) ) % &$) '

9& > %C$%&'( D*   +  , G%$6!$$  2%    !     (851996$&(4 G  *       ,,  5, ,  G    6>$ $  @ %!$K%2% $  !$%;9? 1447:@5%%$6$%&

1& LB%%@= &

0&  %@2$!$%/$% %&

8& 6$  2$%    @L 2>% 6$$ $$ %$  2$!% $$K%   !   04 :$ ;  % 6 %  2$;  $ = 6!!$ C,<. P$<6@ ??448  D2$> $$% ;$$ % 2= 6$!%A$%&'1 6!!$$ $ =6!!$97 :  144( C *DN  ! $  $$  %  @$    % 6 % B2$>%2$%$ /%$$$%% $N  % K%$ $!  $ = 6!!$ 2$ >  2%  2$ >  !%$ @ A  %   5$%& 81  *&  2$!% $$K% %  2 ;  2   $$% >@!B2$> >%K%$: %G5> &  /$66 ;$  $! %Q           -$ ,  - 

2 6$2$!%$$K%%% 6 !A2$%   @LGL66 6!!$ $ 2$/$66

    "141'"1447