Expropriation Compensation Valuation Dispute
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe case concerns a dispute over compensation following the expropriation of private property for public utility works, where the property owner contested the initial compensation award, claiming it did not adequately reflect the true market value of the land, especially considering its potential for development and the date of the decision to expropriate. The court affirmed the award, reasoning that the compensation must be based on the objective market value at the time the expropriation decision took effect, and found that the initial expert valuation, which considered comparable sales and the actual state of the property without speculative future potential, was appropriate and sufficient according to the governing legal framework for determining fair expropriation indemnity.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAExpropriation Compensation Valuation Dispute: The court affirmed the award, reasoning that the compensation must be based on the objective market value at the time the expropriation decision took effect, and found that the initial expert valuation, which considered comparable sales and the actual state of the property without speculative future potential, was appropriate and sufficient according to the governing legal framework for determining fair expropriation indemnity.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IATexte complet
A/175/2013
### [ATAS/785/2014](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1970042) du 25.06.2014 ( ARBIT )
[](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2014/0007/ATAS_000785_2014_A_175_2013.pdf)
* /