Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/783/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/783/2004 Généré par l'IA

Service of Process Substantial Compliance Presumption

Numéro de cause ATAS/783/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerned whether a procedural requirement related to service was met when a document was left with an employee at the designated place of business, despite the employee's lack of specific authority to accept service, and the court reasoned that strict compliance with service rules is generally required unless substantial compliance is demonstrated and no actual prejudice resulted to the defendant. The court ultimately concluded that the evidence established a presumption of proper service because the document was left at the known place of business with an individual apparently in charge, and there was no showing that the defendant was actually prejudiced by the manner of delivery.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 65 al. 1 LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Service of Process Substantial Compliance Presumption: The court ultimately concluded that the evidence established a presumption of proper service because the document was left at the known place of business with an individual apparently in charge, and there was no showing that the defendant was actually prejudiced by the manner of delivery.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
notification d'actes principe de rigueur documentaire condition de recevabilité présomption garantie d'une activité irréprochable déroulement des procédures de passation

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 65 al. 1 LTF
Used to dismiss the appeal in the final orders.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The losing party (appellant) is ordered to pay the costs of the federal procedure.
Généré par l'IA
A/4967/2006
Service of Process and Presumption of Due Execution of Property Instrument
C/19894/2017
Enforceability of Payment Order Dependent on Proof of Service
A/1623/2003
Statutory Notice Requirement and Substantial Compliance
A/2637/2005
Service of Process Statutory Interpretation and Default Judgment
A/3384/2006
Statutory Service Requirements and Default Judgment Validity

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 65 al. 1 LTF

Used to dismiss the appeal in the final orders.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The losing party (appellant) is ordered to pay the costs of the federal procedure.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               %&'((%)+,), -%./(%)+

 -

 -  0-   0 0 

)1  23  "  4 2 )+ 



  05555555555 





66 0 0-  7 0, 8  -   '() !"#$%&

          !"  #"$

   1.*-1  



2) 2'%' 2'3

  4     - 5 .//0    4 677'   61'&' ') 8'12% 6 9 6 2  (2  ' 22 () ': (   2';'')  2 '  2'% (2)('   $  4  ' ' &!)$ 6  2 (2)( 6''  '%3

2' .-5.//06  ( ) )'(2)('2 )(' (() ':2 '23

2' +02(;.//06 '7() '; 46'' )'' ..('.//- )''22'' <=' .//02' 2 6''  '3

6 22''  6> ?-   ' 7) )   2' @))  '  '896 ('''2' ) )''=46$6&' 2)&'3

62%4 626''$46 A' 2) 2 :' 3

 &';=4 'B!) C>



DDDDD



*+,--*.//01.1   1-*-1  



 0 - 6  -  0-   0 0 

"

92:   ;  <   7$ &') !=

+>   $ 6    4  )''  .. (' .//-  )''  22'' <='.//0)>

.> 46)4 &;=>

-> ! C>

0> '42) @'>

?> 7(  2'   46 2& 7(    2) B   )'  -/ = %  '7'' 2 2' (( )  )  '; 7) )   EAF'GA74' , ,//0     ' :(2'>  )'  2 B 2@)>  ()(' 'H 9 ' '4 :(4 )'' )';''2  )'' 4)3 ;9 :2 2 4 ('7 ' '( 2&' (    )''3 9 2  '@     2)> E'  ()('  ' 2  ' ))( )())   9 ;9  9 '1   ';7) ) 22('%46' & )'&;>()(' ('(!  2& 4'  =' '' 4  )'' 4)  6&22  4)):2) ')8>+-.+/,+/<9>

 @77'H  )' H     ' E ;E



2'7( 2)B'7'):2'''46$677'7) ) '2@77



*+,--*.//01.1