Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/779/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/779/2004 Généré par l'IA

Statutory Payment Requirement Substantial Compliance Upon Property Transfer

Numéro de cause ATAS/779/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court addressed whether a statutory provision requiring payment before filing an appeal applied to a party who had already satisfied the underlying judgment by conveying property to the opposing party's receiver pursuant to a court order, even though the receiver had not yet liquidated the property. The court reasoned that the statutory requirement of payment was intended to prevent judgment debtors from frustrating execution while appealing, and since the appellant had complied with a judicial directive by transferring title to the property, which was accepted by the opposing party's representative, this constituted substantial compliance with the payment requirement, thereby satisfying the statutory condition for appeal.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Statutory Payment Requirement Substantial Compliance Upon Property Transfer: The court reasoned that the statutory requirement of payment was intended to prevent judgment debtors from frustrating execution while appealing, and since the appellant had complied with a judicial directive by transferring title to the property, which was accepted by the opposing party's representative, this constituted substantial compliance with the payment requirement, thereby satisfying the statutory condition for appeal.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
condition légale transmission de la propriété ordre de paiement hypothèque légale du vendeur d'immeuble vente avec obligation de montage titre exécutoire

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited in the final order to rule on the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               #$%$&#'(#)# * +#%%&#)'',

 +

- + - *+.  - * .* 

)/  01    2 0 )'', 



 3333333333 





4. *   ! "#$%&$ ##'(

            !"

   *!)+*  

"(##",-.#/((" !'#!00+('.*.1"2!3450 67+06"'#"28#!00+9

9

"#"4"(':!00+4'!;.':!00<9

"###$.#,"=#((9

"66='%':'(%+23<5067."" '. =   ,// % ':  '' % # " !00 67 . '#=,"*.#'",'.#("">#/#:9

,#$#",(#"7



?????



)  *+)+*  

  * .+ 5  + - *+.  - * .* 

 600   7

809   :  7   6" $;) .<

7   % ,-@      "  =  ' "A % # " ':' " .*.1 . B# BCCCCCCCCCC  '( . " "'.%+23<5067

!7 ,D"'=":#7

+7   % B# BCCCCCCCCCC "  =,# ,// % ':  ''%#"!0067.'#7

<7 ,D"'=":#7

57 #=,"*.#'",'.#("">#/#: .(E","$#"'#$("(6###$7

F7 #=.("/#7



 /66#G  (#"G   ## ::#                 

.#6'".(E#6#(>.###=,%,66#6("( "#./66



)