Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/768/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/768/2005 Généré par l'IA

Contract Abandonment and Extinguishment of Debt Obligation

Numéro de cause ATAS/768/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute involved multiple claims regarding the alleged breach of a contract concerning the financing and sale of a business, with one party asserting that an earlier agreement establishing a debt obligation and payment schedule had been repudiated and that subsequent dealings were separate. The court reasoned that the evidence demonstrated a clear intention by the parties to abandon the prior contract, as evidenced by their subsequent actions and agreements, and thus affirmed the lower court's finding that the obligations under the original agreement were extinguished, precluding recovery based on its terms.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contract Abandonment and Extinguishment of Debt Obligation: The court reasoned that the evidence demonstrated a clear intention by the parties to abandon the prior contract, as evidenced by their subsequent actions and agreements, and thus affirmed the lower court's finding that the obligations under the original agreement were extinguished, precluding recovery based on its terms.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
obligation de conclure recouvrement de créances modalités de vente action en paiement pacte successoral de renonciation résiliation du bail

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This article governs the allocation of court costs, which was applied in the final dispositive order.
Généré par l'IA
A/3634/2006
Breach of Contract and Foreclosure on Financial Transactions
A/2632/2004
Contractual Disputes Over Property Interests and Termination Rights
A/1001/2004
Contract Termination Dispute and Post-Termination Obligations
A/1697/2007
Contractual Breach and Liability Dispute
A/2327/2003
Contractual Breach and Contract Termination Affirmation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article governs the allocation of court costs, which was applied in the final dispositive order.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               %&'((%)((* %+,-%)((*

!! 

. !/.   .!  

0 1 2 # &* 3 1 )((* 

 !"#$#"% & ! '(' )*'($$ '#$# +  &,



$



&     -  &.   &/& .0! 12$' 34!"$!5655   7 '#8'

                ! "#$

   *692*  

 # 4# " <=($ ' 6> "$(? 6;;@!  ? ' "(A $  "#8$'#$#+ &,B

 #$$-'($$CB

"'#'6D$?6;;2! $=E'("$! $""$A($&     -  &.   & /*"A& .0#(#"($'$?$)$8( $#("F#"#$#B

"'#""$'5@(6;;1!& .8(#$$'#B

-$##$<$#@;(6;;1$'$'#B

-  #=($  $  '#  ""$ $  $$ &9 9 9  ,  $8# "  &&        &     & B

    4#   =E  -=$ <' /0  #$# ('8#$$$#!'A5G$6;;@! ?$'! ("#'C<=!'$"#'$$E*"#'$!C""#$$H <=/$I5$I$17 0B

 $ , -$ ' -#$ ' <= ! "  ? 8#'#  6:<E6;;2/ .5@;5;70!' =E'"$#!5@8#E! '"$$$=$"($$$ ?$' ' #=   , $ <= $$! ! ' -$$$ ' -#$ ' E)<=B

  ? $ '  J$  $ C ' $$$ "#E,-$I@D'=E$8(/$I17I60B

("#$"<=''-"A$#$?B

-)$('-$I52'=E"#''($$E/ 0 "#' "$ 4$ "' C  $ '#"' '  $ '- C$ E!"#'($$E"'$'E$$$$#<C-,'$ C$B

- 8$!  " $ "? C ')  $ "'$ 'E$  (4(<'$B



9:2196;;2  *@92*   - -"A!  $ '  "#' 95>;;96;;1  ($A '- . '#"' ' - '  "#' 95D>:96;;1  ($A '- &! $$ ' "$ ' E '  "?$# C '  ' ($$ ' $?$ C $ 8)#  "*$ '(,- &/$I6:I5 .0B



9:2196;;2  *292*  

!  5  !/.   .!  

#

678   9  3   :$ &,) ;<

5I &"' -$  ""$ ' -$I 52   <C-, '$  '  "#' 95D>:96;;1B

6I #E$'"#'I     =88AK  #'$K   .. L& L  





"8('"#$4$$$8#)"$"=88





9:2196;;2