ATAS/767/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/767/2005 Généré par l'IA

Property Instrument Validity and Notice Dispute

Numéro de cause ATAS/767/2005

Autorité / Tribunal Cour de Justice (Cour civile) · Chambre des assurances sociales

Juridiction

Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)

Date de la décision 2005-09-15

Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party challenged a judgment concerning the validity of certain legal instruments and their impact on property rights, arguing that the lower court erred in its interpretation of statutory requirements for validity and notice. The court reasoned that the challenged instruments failed to meet the necessary formal requisites and lacked proper recordation, thereby invalidating them against the opposing party who acted without actual notice, affirming the lower court's decision based on the lack of compliance with governing formalities for establishing rights against third parties.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Property Instrument Validity and Notice Dispute: The court reasoned that the challenged instruments failed to meet the necessary formal requisites and lacked proper recordation, thereby invalidating them against the opposing party who acted without actual notice, affirming the lower court's decision based on the lack of compliance with governing formalities for establishing rights against third parties.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA

interprétation de l'arrêt droit à la propriété condition de validité objet du litige délégation de possession faux matériel dans les titres

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article governs the distribution of court costs, which is ordered in the final disposition.

Généré par l'IA

Property Instrument Validity Dispute

Property Conveyance Validity Dispute

Instrument Interpretation and Property Rights Dispute

Lien Enforcement Validity Due to Defective Notice

Property Conveyance Validity Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article governs the distribution of court costs, which is ordered in the final disposition.

Texte complet

$%&&'$%(() $*+*$%(()

, !-, , !

./0 1 # 2) 3/0 %(()

! " " ## $ #% # # # # "/0 # # #!"& '()*! +,-.

! "#

2,1*2

, 4!

3 &0 & 4 56 ,--)! ## $ # % # # # # # # # 72 389:/0 ;$$6"3&"<" :/&/=$6"3:36;$3"3">$"" &:"&/8303&0""&?@

3&":/0$0;$3"06"/"6 &0>03"&5":":&$"";/;">&@

$ &" & ,- / ,--)! $0 $" 30"0 A'" & " :/0 33"@

3&0&,.5,--)!""0;$33"!:/03& ;"/38":"&&0"A!0""6?@

3&,)5",--)!$0"5"0"""&0@

$ <3;0 ; &0/' :" #& 6" 3 ?3 3 & "/3;306@

3 & +* B" ,--)! $0 /30"0 <3;" 3 ; '"" 3 & $A" &"0 > $"" & :><2://@

& 03 & + 3"/? ,--)! $ " 33"0 > 5" $A" & 6?"0 & " 3 3"0 & "/ " &&033"@

$ 300 ;$> /3" & / & 5" ,--)! 6" 6" &" "!&"0A0""/3C

! !

A6 $A" 5& 7@ ,-)9 0"0 /&:0 " ""0&8+B",--D ?"&/30& ; 5A! &" 30&" " 6230&"! ; 330" " E 5A 7"C+"C")) 9@

">$"&$0"&5A3 ?:0&0,4 56,--*7 %+D-++-F9!& A6&3"0!+D:06! &3" "" A" 7"C +F, 9 3/""" # & 0A ! > " 5A ""! & $""" & $0" & 6< 5A @

1,..*1,--) 2D1*2 :/0/">$")FC,"C! #G""; & """ 306 > $"C D. & " & + / +HHF ":/7 %)+-9@

/30"35A&&$38"&0"?@

?"";!"5"0"/3"7"CD.C+ %9" 6?:/@

$ ; $ :" /; $""0 "/0! "" &0 & 3" 3" : $?5"&$33"&D-56"":"@

$33":/0,-/,--)2"3&;"/38":" &&0"AI"&/:"/""&6@

$&00A3"("3A0@

$::"0"0&&"<A;""3"3("/3 30"3&"/3@

$ "/ " / < 3?"0 & """ & " /8 ; 3" '" 6 ""& ; $" ; " $?5" & 30& " &0:"6/""0:7!"&/"":!6/,!+HH+! 3C+.+9@

$"""&&03"3&"("&0!&/8<3"!> &" ; ;0" " 0"0 /3('0! :"! &$A & &0 :<0 " 3 "" ;$ &/& & """ /"60! &;" " & $/3('/"!"30"0&+-5>/3"&=0@

$$A">&&3"/30"6<;3"("&0A0@

$$38!/":&"""6?&$0"06;0@

$J&8&"";$33"0""::"6/"6?@

&8&"("5"0@

1,..*1,--) 2*1*2

!4 !-, , !

#

567 // 8 3 9 : 2+% ";

7 /

+C 06?C

# 7

,C 5""C

DC ";30&"A""C A::8 30&" %% K# K 3:/&30"(""":0<3"3A::

1,..*1,--)