Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/756/2014 • CJ GE ATAS/756/2014 Généré par l'IA

Stipulation of Withdrawal Validity Appeal

Numéro de cause ATAS/756/2014
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court considered an appeal concerning a decision that upheld a prior ruling regarding the validity of a stipulation of withdrawal in ongoing legal proceedings. The initial parties had agreed to withdraw their respective claims and counterclaims, and the court, in adherence to the stipulation, declared the matter closed. The appellate court reasoned that the stipulation, being freely and clearly consented to by all parties before the competent authority, was valid and binding, thus justifying the prior dismissal of the case, as it extinguished the legal disputes between the parties.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Stipulation of Withdrawal Validity Appeal: The initial parties had agreed to withdraw their respective claims and counterclaims, and the court, in adherence to the stipulation, declared the matter closed. The appellate court reasoned that the stipulation, being freely and clearly consented to by all parties before the competent authority, was valid and binding, thus justifying the prior dismissal of the case, as it extinguished the legal disputes between the parties.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
arrêts en appréciation de validité droit de rétractation procédure de nullité et renonciation créance contestée décision motivée réputation de retrait d'opposition
Généré par l'IA
C/19584/2019
Appeal Withdrawal Validity and Cost Implications
C/10520/2017
Appeal Withdrawal and Case Dismissal
C/24298/2020
Appeal Withdrawal and Dismissal
C/2989/2021
Withdrawal of Appeal Effecting Final Decision
C/11345/2023
Appeal Withdrawal Following Settlement

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/345/2014

### [ATAS/756/2014](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1970049) du 19.06.2014 ( PC ) , ADMIS

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2014/0007/ATAS_000756_2014_A_345_2014.pdf)

* /