Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/755/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/755/2006 Généré par l'IA

Statutory Interest Calculation Post-Judgment Rate Control

Numéro de cause ATAS/755/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party challenged the interpretation of a statute concerning the calculation of statutory interest following a judgment, asserting that the statute mandated the continuous application of a specific, presumably lower, rate from the date of the underlying obligation until payment, rather than the statutory rate applicable at the time of judgment or subsequent amendments. The court reasoned that the plain language of the controlling statute clearly dictates that the statutory interest rate in effect at the time of the entry of judgment governs the post-judgment interest calculation, as the statute specifically ties the interest rate to the date of the judgment, and subsequent legislative changes do not retroactively alter this established post-judgment obligation.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Statutory Interest Calculation Post-Judgment Rate Control: The court reasoned that the plain language of the controlling statute clearly dictates that the statutory interest rate in effect at the time of the entry of judgment governs the post-judgment interest calculation, as the statute specifically ties the interest rate to the date of the judgment, and subsequent legislative changes do not retroactively alter this established post-judgment obligation.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
calcul des intérêts interprétation de l'arrêt intérêt moratoire légal modification législative déduction en fonction de la durée de la possession calcul de la saisie de salaire

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal judicial proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               %&'()%&' %)++%&'



, -, !  ,! !

!. / '

# 0 1 / &' 



 !"#$ %&& "#"

'

& !    "$3"

(  &    &   ! ) $)"&#"!*" +$,'-!.' /01!-22- &  

               !  "#$

  545  



  "#" " -7 8' 522/ " 9   "$.$ : ;' "  &  '  ("' ''' ..$'*  :  *' : ;<''";''''";=

"-2>'522/" & "#"#.'' "$"?8.'''.$"."'$3$:?'' .""''#.')$."#"5>'522/=

   " -@ >' 522/ " "#" "$' '  "#" .A " <"$=

  ! 2  -, !  ,! !

#

345   6  1   7$ 8'& "9

-9 "'"''""#"=

59 B"C=

69 '?.$"')''9  )33A  $"'   B& $  .3#".$'D'''3$E.'?F:F333$"$ ".)33

    45/604522/