Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/747/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/747/2004 Généré par l'IA

Breach of Contract: Failure to Satisfy Performance Requirement

Numéro de cause ATAS/747/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute arose from a contractual agreement where one party claimed the other failed to satisfy a specific performance requirement, leading to alleged damages. The court analyzed the terms of the contract, focusing on the precise language defining the performance obligation and the surrounding circumstances of the agreement. The court reasoned that the language of the contract clearly established the required performance standard, and based on the evidence presented regarding the actual performance rendered, the defendant had indeed failed to meet this contractual standard, thus affirming liability for breach of contract and necessitating a remedy for the resulting damages as outlined in the agreement.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 93 LTF, Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Breach of Contract: Failure to Satisfy Performance Requirement: The court analyzed the terms of the contract, focusing on the precise language defining the performance obligation and the surrounding circumstances of the agreement. The court reasoned that the language of the contract clearly established the required performance standard, and based on the evidence presented regarding the actual performance rendered, the defendant had indeed failed to meet this contractual standard, thus affirming liability for breach of contract and necessitating a remedy for the resulting damages as outlined in the agreement.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
inexécution d'une obligation contractuelle exécution en nature qualification du contrat obligation de prester de l'assureur prestation en vue du paiement partie au contrat

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 93 LTF
The appeal is declared inadmissible based on this article.
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF
The decision to declare the appeal inadmissible was made using the simplified procedure.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This article governs the allocation of court costs, which were imposed in the final order.
Généré par l'IA
A/1840/2002
Breach of Contract for Failure to Meet Explicit Performance Standard
A/2303/2003
Contract Breach and Performance Dispute
A/277/2005
Contractual Breach and Interpretation of Performance Obligations
A/2933/2006
Contract Breach and Performance Deficiencies
A/1661/2003
Contractual Breach and Damages Award

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 93 LTF

The appeal is declared inadmissible based on this article.

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF

The decision to declare the appeal inadmissible was made using the simplified procedure.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article governs the allocation of court costs, which were imposed in the final order.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

     

     !! "## !!

$ $%

& "'(& %"$  &% $%'

) * + , !!

- %. ,

  

) (//////////   ! "#  $ %%  & % %' # (# %##

 

"' //////////   ////////// %()%   !*      & % %'  (# %##



0 1 23324 + %###( , - ./+ ( 

0 1 

     " 23/"

) 5) !# 7777777777+ ( (  !*  "#  $+  %(( 8 % #9 % (  %% :# 0  ' & # $7777777777 # %( 0 # ;   % .<6=/ )> ?6 : # (@ 0 AB %8  . C:# .44=+ % .<64D )> .A : # (@ 0 AB %8  . C:# .44?+  % .<=A5 )> : # (@ 0 AB %8  . C:# .444 E

    ( (    & #   # % %% 0 #  %  # #  E

  & #+ #  # 0  F% #  #:    G % (%  9 % %#   E

)   '  # H:#  &H# # C%### % 22 :9 .45.   ( ( %#)#(  '& #9   %  #  ( ( # # ( %8  . I 266/+     #  #'        #  #: 0  (:; )#  # #  # % (:;+  #  ;  %#  J > .  >   AD  > .  > 9 ,> . K E

& :  % & # =. > . %  #   (% %##  #: % .2  9 .4?A J K+ & # (  %+ %&))#   '@ + &   % # %  #  # C#%#'   #9 %&@  )) (  &# %  (% E '  %(##  %:# %   9 E

&#  C #)# %8  %&    F% #  #:    G E

 "# &    )# :#  %#  %  # %   '&# :# % # )#L  %(#  '&  %( # E

3.4/53266/ " /3/"

 % $"'1  "'(& %"$  &% $%'

)

26   7 3 +   3823 9 $:

.>     F% #  #:    G>

2> # '  #8 % %#  0  %## #    #  H)) % #9 % (>

/> # )#L  %(#  .A  9 2665   %( #>

5> # '  (%  H # >

5> )   # %  '< : )     ( @ %  %(# % ! ;) %8   #)# #  # %( %(  #9 )(%( % + $,M#-,)'# D+ D665   +  # L#>  %(#   @  H(>  (# %# N K #%#' L  ' %(##   %(# 9 #  #   %  %(##  '(E 9K L  '  #) #  # :# %%     %(##E K    #H    %  (  > $#  (#   #   # ((  (((    K 9K  K #"%+  #9 )(%( %         #8    '<# %: %( #:9>  (# %   #   ; % :+ '#  C# + ## '  %(##  '(  <: % '   ( ( L(%#(   J > ./2+ .6D  .6? K>

 H))#8 N  (#%  N

!#"#  O # P   

 # ) % ( @   #)#( L  # ## '&0 &))# )(%( %  #   H)) 

3.4/53266/