Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/734/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/734/2007 Généré par l'IA

Claimant v. Agency Regarding Denial of Benefits Based on Unproven Common-Law Marriage

Numéro de cause ATAS/734/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party sought review of a judgment that affirmed an administrative determination denying a claim for benefits based on a finding that the claimant failed to establish the existence of a qualifying relationship, as the evidence presented was insufficient to prove the purported common-law marriage because the jurisdiction did not recognize such marriages, and the court reasoned that the administrative agency's finding, supported by substantial evidence that the parties never intended to create a present, ongoing marital relationship as required by the jurisdiction's law, was not arbitrary or capricious and therefore must be upheld.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Claimant v. Agency Regarding Denial of Benefits Based on Unproven Common-Law Marriage: A party sought review of a judgment that affirmed an administrative determination denying a claim for benefits based on a finding that the claimant failed to establish the existence of a qualifying relationship, as the evidence presented was insufficient to prove the purported common-law marriage because the jurisdiction did not recognize such marriages, and the court reasoned that the administrative agency's finding, supported by substantial evidence that the parties never intended to create a present, ongoing marital relationship as required by the jurisdiction's law, was not arbitrary or capricious and therefore must be upheld.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
common law cas de rigueur conjugal validité du mariage fixation de compétence recours en annulation en droit de l'Union concubinage non déclaré

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The appellant is ordered to pay the court fees because the appeal was dismissed.
Généré par l'IA
A/443/2019
Appeal Regarding Denial of Supplementary Benefits Based on Flawed Cohabitation Finding
A/3772/2005
Claimant v. Agency: Affirmance of Benefit Denial Based on Substantial Evidence
A/4370/2015
Benefit Reimbursement Based on Alleged Cohabitation
A/123/2015
Denial of Temporary Residence Based on Insufficient Proof of Genuine Spousal Relationship
A/1765/2018
Appeal Regarding Denial of Supplemental Benefits Due to Alleged Cohabitation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The appellant is ordered to pay the court fees because the appeal was dismissed.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

           $())(+,,- $$(-./(+,,-

$"

  %$! $%%$! " $$%"  $!"

01  +  +2 3  +,,- 



    !"##$ %& %%'  



'%

((   )      % ' ! +,$-'.#/"#"" "0





            !!" #!!"$%% &      '

   4#1#4  

!  03%#33$5

%%". #33$5

  %% %   %%'  "% 6  #33$ -% 7  !% %' %%  %%5

) 8 ')-%%''%+%%9:

$ "   !"  %$! $%%$! " $$%"  $!"

": %'%'% '%%:

#: +%9:

 &%;; %  %! '<          %%* =* 

- ;%-%!'%%>''' ; !?-%' -%&%;;



1"22"1#33$