Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/721/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/721/2004 Généré par l'IA

Judgment Preclusion and Arbitration Award Enforcement on Same Contract

Numéro de cause ATAS/721/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute centered on whether a party, having previously sued on a contract and obtained a judgment referencing specific repayment terms, was barred from subsequently bringing a new action to enforce an arbitration award related to the same contract due to claims of prior resolution and waiver. The court reasoned that the initial lawsuit, which resulted in a judgment incorporating only some terms of the underlying agreement, did not preclude the subsequent enforcement action for the arbitration award, as the arbitration concerned a different facet of the contractual relationship and the initial judgment did not explicitly or implicitly waive the right to seek enforcement of the separate award.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Judgment Preclusion and Arbitration Award Enforcement on Same Contract: The court reasoned that the initial lawsuit, which resulted in a judgment incorporating only some terms of the underlying agreement, did not preclude the subsequent enforcement action for the arbitration award, as the arbitration concerned a different facet of the contractual relationship and the initial judgment did not explicitly or implicitly waive the right to seek enforcement of the separate award.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
convention d'arbitrage exécution notion de décision partie au contrat renonciation au droit adjudication aux enchères

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied for the ordering of court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               #$%&'#&(($ #'&$#&(()



 *+ + +  *+  

),  -.   $% /  &(() 



 +** 0 ++ 1*+ ' 2  *22+   0* + * +  3+ * +4 0*5  !"#$ %&



(!

6 07777777777 )*+"

'  !!

*  



                 !"

   "1.4"  

!! 5 6 78'!  1 7  /##$   9  ' % !  

 6 )  (  ; (&'9 1333    <"  = > "6%   ? 

*  6 '!/#B044*C23@! !)6! ((''89  ( ("6 '!(! ! (6 ! A& /##2@'/##$  5 )8 '(! (*'  6(('6)'!A(!(9@)'9/##2:

)**(')(66( ! (11(&'91333:

     5   (''  ( !(  ( "  ! <  ' &)A(66( ! (*(')6)*:

  )*  * ! &(  5  ) !)  A '6(!  6)7  9  6   A)! !66(&):

  (''  ( !(  ( "   5   A   *  ! A66(!  ('6!  6! ! 6(* !  9  !  66(!  A(8  )&  (D! *& :

(!)!)!' A(   9!((  %/(E!133;:

6! (!)!)! ('6! (6(:

)*6 !)@(!!'(!!(''8!(  !)) 6( )6(( (:

)*AD!6)6()) !) 5  & !)!) '6!  )!)8)@78:

 6 F!  /$ (E! 1334   9  )  6(()  ' &)  A(66( ! (*(')6)*@('(!!/#B130*C00>   ./42#.133//$C3$C1334 G;3.1334?:

 ./012.133/   ";.4"   ( )!  ( ! 5  (  8&(   A(8 ! ( 7    >?  )!) '( * )! ! !)%/(E!133;  9!((  !!!  !  5   (!!! ( ! & @  (  !(   (! ( *'    / ' /##G (!''! >!C / !C ? ! 0G C 1 !C ? ?:

(*(')'!@A!C;C; 6( ! (! !( ( /4(&'9 1331'( * !6)! !( !&!A!)& 8( ! 6!&! (''  (!(('! %A(! (*'    )!) !'  A(    9  ) 5  ! ('6)!! 6( 78   A6%:

 ( A!C ;3 C ;  < A!C 01   A66 5 6 (8  @ A! (  )6! ((''8 !!)6 A(! (*'  @A(!A '6(D:

   9  )  ( F!  /$ (E! 1334  ( )) 5  6(9  !))*)! !88)A!C01 !5A )6( ! ! %'!(''89 6  :

A   &  'F' A8 !  (! 9! ( A(! ( *'   '6D) A'(!!;;#*C/0:



 ./012.133/   "4.4"  

*  0  *+ + +  *+  

 -686   9  /66 6  1" $:&  

  86 

)  ()6! ((''8;(&'91333:

 86

1C A'! ! 6((  ' &)  A(66( ! ( @ (  '(!!  ;;#*C/0:

;C  !5A)'('!6HC  8 I  ) !I   J   =                    









(6 (*('6)!F!!(! * )+6! 68



 ./012.133/