Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/716/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/716/2005 Généré par l'IA

Easement Dispute: Permissive Use Precludes Prescription

Numéro de cause ATAS/716/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court affirmed a judgment regarding a dispute over a specific type of real property interest, determining that the appellant's claim to an easement failed because the prescriptive period required for establishing such an interest had not been met, as the use shown was permissive rather than adverse. The reasoning focused on the absence of clear, open, and continuous use under a claim of right, concluding that the trial court's finding that the use was permissive, based on the underlying relationship and circumstances, was supported by the evidence and therefore correct.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Easement Dispute: Permissive Use Precludes Prescription: The reasoning focused on the absence of clear, open, and continuous use under a claim of right, concluding that the trial court's finding that the use was permissive, based on the underlying relationship and circumstances, was supported by the evidence and therefore correct.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
servitude prescription droit à la propriété rapport de valeur acte d'usurpation ou de trouble séquestre d'immeubles

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/31/2004
Property Dispute Over Prescriptive Easement
A/2000/2005
Easement Dispute Based on Historical Use and Prescription
A/288/2007
Easement Obstruction Dispute
A/1445/2002
Easement Validity Dispute Affirmed
A/4369/2007
Right-of-Way Abandonment and Prescriptive Easement Claim

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

                ! "# !

$$"

% "$&%' ('")'  %$'( )(&

(* + ,   - +  ! 



() .'& ''/ 0' 11 !!"#$ !! %$&&!'((((((((((!!)*)++, -  



!

(& ('")' .'0)&  () '"&)' 2" !# ./,*)0+1   

!!3

4##5!3

4!#!6! !3

       

   :070:

$ ( )"&2  "$&%' ('")'  %$'( )(&

 3445   - 64575   8 3 !# 9 ):

)$ ; <6#2 #=4!; !"2!#"!/2!!=4#"#0>56!0++, =#"! #0>56!0++,2&<$

0$ 4'#2=#?$

@$   ; %! (((((((((( #  =4     =" #4 !"##4##!6!&# !"!!/$

*$ = !"#!<!$

,$  #4!$,+ &!2 !#=4 6&!2! !!! !"!!/##"#@+5!#A& !  !22#"#!" !?&"#"!#!-.BC!.&=>>++*   !D2 !$#" /! !<"$2"2!#E F#=!D2=#"!!#"!?! # #"="3?FD ! !=2&2 6!#2#! !#"3F !!<!#! !"$-2"2!    ! ""2 "2"!"  ! F ?F  F :#  !?&"#"!#! !! !!2A!!!!=4 #6!#"!!!!6?$2"2!#!!2!!2' # !6 = ! 5  =  #" ="  46  # =""D "#"!!G!$)@0)+>)+1F$  <!&&!E !"#E     H#  %    

 &!2# !"!!/&"D !=4;4&&&"#"! #! !<!&&



7)89970++,