Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/714/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/714/2006 Généré par l'IA

Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award Based on Arbitrator Exceeding Authority and Procedural Error

Numéro de cause ATAS/714/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party sought to vacate an arbitration award, arguing that the arbitrator exceeded their authority by interpreting a statute contrary to established precedent and that the award was fundamentally flawed due to a procedural error regarding the submission of evidence. The court reasoned that an arbitrator's interpretation of the law, even if erroneous, does not render an award subject to vacatur unless the error rises to the level of manifest disregard of the law, which was not sufficiently demonstrated here, and further held that the procedural challenge regarding evidence was an issue of contractual interpretation of the arbitration agreement, which the court should not overturn absent a clear showing of bias or exceeding the scope of authority as defined in the agreement.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award Based on Arbitrator Exceeding Authority and Procedural Error: The court reasoned that an arbitrator's interpretation of the law, even if erroneous, does not render an award subject to vacatur unless the error rises to the level of manifest disregard of the law, which was not sufficiently demonstrated here, and further held that the procedural challenge regarding evidence was an issue of contractual interpretation of the arbitration agreement, which the court should not overturn absent a clear showing of bias or exceeding the scope of authority as defined in the agreement.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
arbitrage violation des règles de procédure procédure contentieuse demande de récusation nullité des ententes arbitrabilité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision was applied in the final order regarding the allocation of costs.
Généré par l'IA
A/4323/2005
Vacating Arbitration Award Based on Arbitrator Misconduct
A/3864/2007
Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award Denied for Lack of Manifest Disregard of Law
A/1694/2002
Arbitrator Authority and Scope of Submission in Vacating Award
A/425/2005
Arbitration Award Upheld Despite Claims of Exceeded Authority
A/3702/2007
Arbitration Award Enforcement Despite Alleged Arbitrator Overreach

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was applied in the final order regarding the allocation of costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               #$%&'#$(() *#&'+#$(()

*

 * " *"    "

,  $ ! $$ -. $(() 





   !

 !

" #   $     $% &'( )!)/0 )!!*+,$+-++   -.



       

     ! " !

   (-12(  

!!*5" # /6&)*70/06)/!$68))*7

6 )!4,+24294$*7/ !!*::+;<6;)*6 )!= )0!0 =>

()?;)! 66 )!) !5" # ;)/0*/*6*0))  *+.@)-44,>

 )0!0 *!*-.@)-44,A6 !7B!5)!!0*/ !! 0/0! ))!!*)!) *6 )!>

66)*.@)!-44,$" #)*)50% )6 0*0=7!) *

6 )!$6)'=766)>

6 05!$ !*% 8@!!57)?)*?* C<

  * / " * " *"    "

!

01-2- 3   4- -  -  56 ')$ " 7

  2-

+< 0 %8<

! 2-

-< *!*7!) *6 )!4,+24294<

2< )!5 !*% 8@!<

:< ?*C<

.< )!56 0*!&!)!<





1-23+1-44,  (212(    &;;)'  0)*!F         DE " 8   

 6) ; /*60!B!! !);)0A6!)6&;;



1-23+1-44,