Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/713/2012 • CJ GE ATAS/713/2012 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Regarding Rejection of Beneficial Ownership Recognition

Numéro de cause ATAS/713/2012
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerned a challenge to a decision regarding an administrative filing, where the appellant contested the rejection of their application for recognition as a beneficial owner, alleging a violation of property rights and administrative law principles. The court partially admitted the appeal, finding that while the initial administrative determination was flawed in its reasoning regarding the specific nature of the beneficial interest claimed, certain procedural errors in the administrative review process necessitated annulment of the contested decision, thereby remitting the matter for a new assessment consistent with the established legal criteria for beneficial ownership recognition.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Regarding Rejection of Beneficial Ownership Recognition: The court partially admitted the appeal, finding that while the initial administrative determination was flawed in its reasoning regarding the specific nature of the beneficial interest claimed, certain procedural errors in the administrative review process necessitated annulment of the contested decision, thereby remitting the matter for a new assessment consistent with the established legal criteria for beneficial ownership recognition.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
recours contre des décisions administratives détention du contrôle économique violation de garanties procédurales production de créance recours en annulation en droit de l'Union droit à la propriété

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article was applied to rule on the costs of the appeal, as indicated in the dispositive.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/3004/2010

### [ATAS/713/2012](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1967106) du 18.05.2012 ( AI ) , PARTIELMNT ADMIS

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2012/0007/ATAS_000713_2012_A_3004_2010.pdf)

* /